SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Technical analysis for shorts & longs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Johnny Canuck who wrote (70652)2/10/2026 3:36:41 AM
From: Johnny Canuck  Respond to of 70665
 
Are the other companies on the list for the last answer also all non-operating companies?

No, the other companies on the list (from the previous comparison table) are not all non-operated E&P companies like NOG.

NOG (Northern Oil and Gas) is a pure-play non-operated company — it acquires minority working interests and mineral interests in wells and properties operated by third-party operators (e.g., major drillers in the Bakken, Permian, etc.), without running any day-to-day operations, rigs, or field management itself. This asset-light model avoids operational risks and costs but relies on partnerships and acquisitions for growth.

In contrast, the peers are primarily operated (or mixed, with operated as the core focus):

  • Chord Energy (CHRD): Primarily an operated E&P company, focused on the Williston Basin (Bakken). It acquires, explores, develops, and produces assets where it acts as the operator (e.g., running drilling programs and managing wells). It may hold some minor non-operated positions, but its strategy and production are driven by operated assets.
  • Civitas Resources (CIVI): An operated independent E&P, with core operations in the Permian Basin (Texas/New Mexico) and formerly the DJ Basin (Colorado). It focuses on acquisition, development, and production as the operator. (Note: As of early 2026, Civitas merged into SM Energy, with the combined entity operating under the SM ticker and name, but the pre-merger Civitas model was operated.)
  • Matador Resources (MTDR): Strongly operated, particularly in the Permian (Delaware Basin) and Haynesville Shale. It drills and completes its own wells (e.g., turning dozens of net operated wells to sales quarterly), with some non-operated interests (e.g., in Haynesville gas), but operated activities dominate its production and strategy.
  • Permian Resources (PR): A primarily operated independent focused on the Permian Basin. It emphasizes efficient development and production of its own wells, with some bolt-on acquisitions including non-operated positions (e.g., royalties or minority interests offset to its core areas), but the bulk of its value comes from operated acreage and drilling.
  • SM Energy (SM): An operated E&P company, with significant operated positions in the Permian and other basins. Post its 2026 merger with Civitas, it remains focused on operated assets across high-return shale plays.
Summary Table for Clarity



To: Johnny Canuck who wrote (70652)2/10/2026 3:57:33 AM
From: Johnny Canuck  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70665
 
In this video from Ninepoint Partners, Eric Nuttall provides key insights from the IEA-IEF-OPEC Symposium in Riyadh, highlighting a significant shift toward "energy realism" and a looming supply crisis.

The Looming Oil Supply Crisis
  • Shift in Tone: Nuttall notes that the International Energy Agency (IEA) has shifted from predicting peak oil demand to acknowledging a massive need for investment to meet growing demand through 2050 [ 00:22].

  • Peak Shale: A central theme was that the world has entered a "post-shale" era. OPEC analysis suggests shale oil has peaked, and non-OPEC production will peak within the next few years [ 01:16].

  • Demand vs. Supply: OPEC projects oil demand will grow by 19 million barrels per day by 2050 [ 01:10]. With spare capacity likely lower than consensus (estimated at ~1.5 million barrels), there is a major question regarding where future supply will come from [ 01:34].

  • Investment Gap: Approximately 90% of the $540 billion in necessary annual capital expenditure is required just to maintain current production due to increasing decline rates in existing fields [ 02:45].

Inventory Discrepancies
  • While the IEA predicted inventory builds, real-world data shows global inventories have actually fallen by 14 million barrels per day early in the year [ 01:56]. Nuttall remains bullish, expecting the "glut" narrative to be debunked in the coming months [ 02:13].

AI and Rising Power Demand
  • Data Center Consumption: AI is driving unprecedented surges in electricity demand. For perspective, one medium-sized data center consumes as much power as a city of 100,000 people [ 03:32].

  • Natural Gas: Because of this surging demand for power, Nuttall believes natural gas will be a major beneficiary in the global energy market [ 03:50].

youtube.com



Live From Riyadh: The Post-Shale World Is Here — And Markets Aren’t Ready




To: Johnny Canuck who wrote (70652)2/10/2026 11:10:27 AM
From: robert b furman1 Recommendation

Recommended By
toccodolce

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70665
 
Good morning, Johnny,

I have has CHRD and SM on my watch list since 2024.

SM just completed its merger with Civitas. I was hoping for a further price decline here in Q1 (seasonality weakness) - CHRD as well.

I own PR and really want to add more.

I bought NOG, PR and VTS in early 2025.

PR has by far excelled in price vs. the others.

PR is a likely candidate for an acquisition from a larger E&P IMO.

Their claim to fame is the lowest cost of drilling a linear foot of pipeline on thier contiguous acreage in the Permian. It is a Permian pureplay. They incorporate all of the best technology for a mid-tier player: dual fuel electricity generation and only now make 3 and 4 mile laterals.

In 2025 PR was the ninth largest producer of oil in the Permian basin.

I have 4500 shares with an average cost of $12.64.yielding 4.75%. In 2025 they went from a variable dividend to a 15 cent quarterly dividend - which I like and expect it to go up.

In 2024 they made a billion dollar acquisition from OXY (obtained from OXY's ANADARKO acquisition) PR was complemented in making an acquisition that was a BIG E&P like acquisition. The acquisition was for contiguous land of PR's. They promptly started only 3 and 4 mile laterals..

Dan Steffens thinks they are a prime candidate to be bought up.

I had sold off my highest cost shares and regret it now. I would love to build that position to 10,000 shares.

I had wanted to buy CHORD at a lower price. I love the $1.30 quarterly dividend, but it trades over $100.00.

With the Iran conflict (which I'm thinking gets kinetic on or before the next new moon on the 17th - US go to war in the dark).has been a boost to all E&P shares.

The timing to add to oil stocks is off for a while.

Oil stocks were at a very reasonable price level on April 9th of 2025. They all have done well since.

Usual price weakness takes place in the low volume Q1 of each year.

2026 may not be good timing with vortec cold waves and Iranian conflict.

If a regime change occurs, we might have an opportunistic window between now and mid April.

One good thing about the spike in oil we know, is the nonoperating oil companies (NOG and VTS) have surely hedged a large portion of their 2026 production. I'm thinking the dividends are more than safe at this point in time.

The one pipeline company I added to this month is Plains General Partner , symbol PAGP. Not to be confused with the Limited Partner Plains. PAGP is a C-Corp and distributes a Qualified Dividend. They are in the midst of selling their LNG business in Canada (hope to have the sale completed by the end of this quarter) They have not waited for funding and have bought 100% of the EPIC pipeline. I like pipelines and this pipeline connects the Eagle Ford and Permian Basin to the deep-water port in Corpus Christi Tx. It is more accessible than the Houston Ship Channel which has traffic restrictions due to its very bust traffic

PAGP has just recently increased their dividend to $1.67 a year. If bought at $20.00 or below, it yields out nicely at 8.25% - 8.50%. I'm trying to buy the stock by selling $20.00 puts and getting them assigned to me. If PAGP drops below $20.00 I'll be a direct buyer of the stock.

I like that PAGP is a pipeline Company located in Houston.

It is not a KMI, but they are going in the right direction. They also have pipelines going up to Canada and state they can now be an opportunistic buyer of heavy Canadia crude and ship it to the Midwest and/or Texas.

Like XOM's CEO says They have "ADVANTAGED ASSETS". It's a riskier bet than XOM, (by far) but that is my hope that they are thinking correctly and selling nonstrategic assets and buying assets they can improve on with modest Capex. They have an attractive plan, but it needs to evolve in a broader turn around plan. Meanwhile getting paid 8% plus while waiting does compound nicely.

Hope thet helps.

Meanwhile GO COHU. If Cohu keeps its run here, I'll be selling Cohu and buying more PR, CHRD, PAGP, NOG.and VZ. I have a full position of VTS now.

All in an attempt to build my Dividend Revenue Stream of Qualified Dividends

Bob