SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : ESVS vs DCLK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: OtherChap who wrote (86)2/26/1998 9:21:00 PM
From: Joe Copia  Respond to of 717
 
Sounds like you may become a believer yet OtherChap. Would much rather have you on my side ...

Joe PTG&LI !!! 98% invested in NTZ



To: OtherChap who wrote (86)2/26/1998 10:07:00 PM
From: Sandy Berry  Respond to of 717
 
OC - if not referring to NETZ, then to whom -- BAAT, ACCY, HVSFD???
Please be specific.
Thank you.
SB



To: OtherChap who wrote (86)2/26/1998 10:28:00 PM
From: bsl113  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 717
 
What is your occupation otherchap? You are obviously
have demonstrated that you are persistent, observant,
and tenacious. I have no doubts you could work in almost
any field of work. So why would you waste your time posting
your contrarian views about this one single security when
their countless other stocks that could benefit from your
"unpaid" services. Are you concerned for the financial
well being of NETZ investors that much? I believe that
investors know the risks involved, that's why its investing...

If you really want to work for public service I suggest helping
the elderly cross intersections or help the homeless. Services
such as those would be much more valuable contribution to
society... Instead, you choose to waste your efforts on
one single stock for no monetary compensation. And its done on the behalf of all those potential nameless investors in the world...
Ya, Right....

If you feel so compelled to offer your services to the poor
"helpless" financial community, may I suggest other issues
that might be more valiant:

1. Microsoft vs. DOJ
2. Asia Crisis
3. Capitalizing from military related stocks due to the
Gulf War (It may not be patriotic...)
4. Join the SEC and work on the BAAT case

I know there is no way you will reveal your true motives
regarding NETZ but by not doing so, you have revealed that
you do indeed have another agenda. Furthermore, this agenda
indicates that for some unknown reason, someone wants to
keep this stock down.

Nobody in their right mind would put so much effort into
a stock dumping mission like you have unless there were
monetary objectives of some form. Greed is motivation and
always has been. In no shape or form have you demonstrated
the purpose of goodwill so it MUST BE GREED.

You do not need to reply to this message. It would be pointless...
YOU WILL NEVER IDENTIFY YOURSELF:

1. real name
2. occupation
3. why you joined SI (ever so recently)
4. why you focus on one stock for no monetary gain
5. what is your email address

>>> YOU HAVE NO CREDABILTY and are afraid to reveal yourself
because that is the kind of person you are... YOU DON'T even
believe in yourself to stand behind your name. Why should anyone
believe anything you say?

Prediction, when NETZ goes up and holds you will never return
to SI because your mission would be deemed a failure and there
would be no purpose to post anymore... YOUR SCAM IS NOT WORKING.

Bryan Lehner