SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rocky Reid who wrote (48979)2/27/1998 12:20:00 AM
From: Bill Ulrich  Respond to of 58324
 
Rocky, &#147&#133IOM double counting&#133?&#148 really should be re-thought. First, what sane corporate accountant would allow such a practice? Second, why would KE artificially deflate tie ratios? They've been "lower than expected" in the last several CC's&#151doubt IOM would falsely exaggerate unit sales, thus driving down the TR.

Both of the above points really didn't occur to you before you posed the question??

-MrB



To: Rocky Reid who wrote (48979)2/27/1998 1:31:00 AM
From: Dale Stempson  Respond to of 58324
 
Re: >>>Is Iomega double counting their Zip sales?<<<

You've broken the code Rocky, Iomega has actually sold only 1 million Zips... twelve times each. Uh Oh, I feel another class action lawsuit coming on.



To: Rocky Reid who wrote (48979)2/27/1998 10:15:00 PM
From: John Alan Wallace  Respond to of 58324
 
<<<Is Iomega double counting their Zip sales? >>>

I knew better than give thanks in advance. I hereby retract my thanks to you.

JW


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News