SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : THQ,Inc. (THQI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jonathan Lebed who wrote (3622)2/27/1998 6:43:00 AM
From: Sigmund  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14266
 
Jonathan,

Risk versus reward. There may be more potential reward in FAMH. There is certainly more risk. Wait till you need a note from your broker that you consulted a financial analyst in order to buy it. Then we will see how popular it is.

But you are right. The odds are that it will be either above $1 or below $0.10 soon. Good luck with it.



To: Jonathan Lebed who wrote (3622)2/27/1998 6:10:00 PM
From: Emmo  Respond to of 14266
 
Congratulations, you just made my moron list for your post on your skills as an investor. Say hello to Warren next time you lunch with him. Better yet go to "bookmarks" and delete THQI.



To: Jonathan Lebed who wrote (3622)2/27/1998 7:34:00 PM
From: Robert L. Jacobs  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 14266
 
Your post says:
"I already made 1000% of my money so far this year with WAST. FAMH is next."

If FAMH performs similarly this year, won't that give you a return of 10,000%? Why do you claim you only target 3,000%, with performance numbers like you're anticipating???



To: Jonathan Lebed who wrote (3622)3/10/1998 11:48:00 PM
From: Ken  Respond to of 14266
 
Best of luck, John and I stress the word "luck". I believe in risk-adjusted returns but you obviously are 1000% into absolute returns...slow and steady is just right for me with no big pink-sheet surprises I can't handle. That's the secret of my success. In investing, I'd rather be the tortoise and not the hare.