Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Little Engine who wrote (4295)	2/27/1998 9:57:00 AM
From: Wink	Respond to of 27968

FWIW ...Thought I would jump in the fray as one question has not been asked. "If 'so-and-so' sold 69,000 shares, then he should have some money, right? Then why doesn't he pay the SI fee and tells us himself instead of relaying on emails to others on this thread?" The SI fee seems cheap to me for a "lifetime" membership! ;>)

To: Little Engine who wrote (4295)	2/27/1998 10:14:00 AM
From: art	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27968

little engine I received your private Email a few months ago attempting to persuade me why I should not keep FAMH. I did not answer you then and I have know idea why I am responding now, except I am sick of your posts based on your own damm numbers. First and foremost FAMH is a very sound fundamental company. That is not speculation but based on past performance since their inception to the BB world. They are going to experience growing pains like every other company with there ups and downs. Second maybe you should spend some time behind the charts and get your damm head out of the B....S..... numbers you keep posting. And just maybe you may come to learn more then you claim to post on this thread. Other then that you do not need to reply either in a private EMAIL or to me on this thread. Art

To: Little Engine who wrote (4295)	2/27/1998 10:47:00 AM
From: Jane4IceCream	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27968

Little Engine, Just got back from my run on the beach!! Invigorating... Little Engine, Thanks for twisting things around again!! I am taking a longER-term position in this stock as of this morning:-) Yeah, we all can write to poor Jamie at his email but how can it be verified its not really you? Perhaps you should have Jamie scan his drivers license on the thread for all of us to see. WHO REALLY CARES? Jane

To: Little Engine who wrote (4295)	2/28/1998 12:43:00 PM
From: JIN CHUN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27968

LE, you aren't really shooting straight. This is not an attack, by any means, merely an observation. I, for one, am comfortable with the fact that opening new offices may have been delayed by the acquisitions, which, IMO, are a higher priority, especially considering the fact that opening a new office has many front end costs involved. Yes, acquisitions also have many front end costs, but those are ameliorated by the fact, yes the fact, that they attain an instant cash flow and revenue base for the company, whereas a new office may take some time before going into the black. Also, there have been many instances where you have purposefully or not, misrepresented issues. The time that comes to mind is when you issued the false news release in jest. I know that to you it was a farce, and a parody to the issues which you have presented. IMO, however, it was and remains to be wholly irresponsible and at the very least discourteous. Jin.