Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : GIFS -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mark Rutheiser who wrote (7268)	2/27/1998 2:35:00 PM
From: Ken Todd	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8012

I remember once asking Mike Rehtorik why all the concern with the SI posts; to me they only represented a portion of the investor population. I remember he and you talking about getting Jamie Pulaski to try to turn the board around when it became negative. Pulaski got on board and tried to kick a**--when numerous questions came up. I remember him trying badger more than one person off the board when they came on with questions or negatives.Without knowing the whole scenario, I couldn't fathom all the time and interest he spent on the phone with Essary, yourself, and others. IMHO, I wondered, "Why does what these guys do matter so much; Why must they get the "inside scoop" before everyone else? At first I thought this guy (Rehorik) really knows his stuff. He can talk to Essary, put out a release and then the stock goes sky high. Rehtorik could sit at his desk and tell me which Market Makers had upped their asking price; he always had me send their faxed press releaes in certain orders. I also started wondering why Essary turned up in almost every deal we did. Later, it came to me that the thousands of shares of GIFS and IMXS stock we're sending to a certain account each day are being used to payoff those individuals who are perpetuating this myth. Mark, are you honestly saying that you did not know what Gayle was doing? Ken