Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : NAMX -- North American Expl.-- Que Sera Sera! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Terry Lyon who wrote (2787)	2/27/1998 4:10:00 PM
From: cAPSLOCK	Respond to of 4736

Whee fun... Then after that I think I might like to try sword swallowing... cAPSLOCK

To: Terry Lyon who wrote (2787)	2/27/1998 4:50:00 PM
From: M. M. Jones	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4736

1. M.M.Jones 2. Y 3. N/A 4. - 5. The press releases? Mostly always, but cautious. 6. Sometimes 7. Just because he's obsessed doesn't mean he wasn't screwed. 8. 0 (P.S. I have no intention of selling.)

To: Terry Lyon who wrote (2787)	2/28/1998 4:42:00 PM
From: Ray Juliano	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4736

1. Poster name: Ray Juliano 2. Are you a shareholder now: Y 3. If not now, were you a past shareholder: N/A 4. Do you think NAMX has positive or negative EPS: - 5. Do you believe NAMX releases: mostly always but cautious 6. Do you believe Hunter Vann: almost never 7. What is your most compelling reason for your decision: NAMX is associated with some companies that would not waste their time talking to NAMX if there wasn't some potential and Hunter Vann is so bitter from a bad investment I believe he is to biased to be fair and reasonable when speaking about NAMX. 8. Are you considering changing your current position, if any:0

To: Terry Lyon who wrote (2787)	3/1/1998 4:09:00 PM
From: Tim Gaines	Respond to of 4736

1. Poster name: Tim Gaines 2. Are you a shareholder now: Yes 3. If not now, were you a past shareholder: 4. Do you think NAMX has positive or negative EPS: potential of + 5. Do you believe NAMX releases: mostly always 6. Do you believe Hunter Vann: almost never 7. What is your most compelling reason for your decision: Hunter's problem is with TEIM/Ebeling. Leave us and NAMX out of it. 8. Are you considering changing your current position, if any: +

To: Terry Lyon who wrote (2787)	3/1/1998 8:37:00 PM
From: per strandberg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4736

Terry Lyon, There are several new posters lately on this thread. I'm not sure about who is who, wanting this or that, but I'm of the firm opinion that it's the message, not the messenger, that's important. If there is anything about NAMX, business/management/technical issues, to be discussed in this forum, I am very happy to see that done and I expect many to participate as they used to. But what has become of this thread? Hunter's propensity for overdoing his attacks on PE and NAMX is well known. His postings may have more of a boring effect than a bearish, but they are easy to skip over. He has a right to post here, regardless of being a shareholder or not. Being a shareholder sometimes makes you put on shades or rosy-red glasses. Now what am I reading on this thread? Post after post with a general call to arms against Hunter Vann? Ridiculing Hunter's attacks on PE by gathering statistics about what others believe about him? If I'm a shareholder does that make my opinion about HV increase in value proportionately to the number of shares? I find question 4 (EPS) as meaningful as asking "Do you believe in Santa Claus?". There are absolutely no verifiable figures on revenues (Marty has optimistically tried do do some calculations) or expenses or explanations of how the drillings were financed or even the number of shares issued (which doesn't change the EPS sign but is relevant). There are a lot of questions, posted by among others Zeev and SOROS, that await answering from NAMX. Facts and figures, guesses and estimates, speculations and extrapolations regarding the COMPANY, not us posters, that is what I hope to find on this thread. If it is true that the company is actively chasing posters on this thread, trying to silence them, then this is also something I want to know about. Sorry, I don't like your poll. 7. What is your most compelling reason for your decision: limited to one sentence Answer: It is limited to one sentence! ps

To: Terry Lyon who wrote (2787)	3/4/1998 3:17:00 PM
From: cAPSLOCK	Respond to of 4736

OK, I'll bite. 1. Poster name: cAPSLOCK 2. Are you a shareholder now: Y 3. If not now, were you a past shareholder: n/a 4. Do you think NAMX has positive or negative EPS: - 5. Do you believe NAMX releases: never 6. Do you believe Hunter Vann: never 7. What is your most compelling reason for your decision: I bought this stock on a lark. I should have taken a trip to Europe and Japan like I want. 8. Are you considering changing your current position, if any:0