Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : (LVLT) - Level 3 Communications -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don S.Boller who wrote (143)	2/27/1998 7:36:00 PM
From: MangoBoy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3873

<< would provide a new - fully tradable stock to use for options for employees, acquisition, etc. >> i agree.

To: Don S.Boller who wrote (143)	2/28/1998 10:50:00 AM
From: David Klein	Respond to of 3873

Don, this is just my opinion but it makes sense to me because Kiewit wants the stock priced where it will be affordable to most people. Also if the company believes that the stock will continue to rise after the split why have an IPO if you do not need the $$. The company will issue stock IMO, but why not do it at 30 or higher if that is what you think you can get. Time will tell.

To: Don S.Boller who wrote (143)	3/2/1998 10:52:00 PM
From: Dog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3873

In Reply to your question as to why the board would split the stock again & so soon? Answer: I had heard that the recommendation to the board in December was to have a 10 to 1 split but that the board wanted to wait till the 1997 financials where done. Then, if things went according to plan, they would have a 2 for 1 split before the IPO. Why would they do this? The theory goes as follows: The Book value per share during 1997 was $10.85 per share after the 5 for 1 split. Earnings for 1997 were anticipated to be $1.15 -- getting a $12.00 per share book value. The disposition of Cal Energy would bring in $4.00 per share gain to get to a book value of $16.00 per share. Then splitting the stock 2 for 1 would give a book value of $8.00. This book value of $8 is the same book value that MFS went public at. I don't think that it is a coincidence. MFS went public at $22 and the rest is pleasant history. The thought is that internet stocks have been going public at much higher multiples. If you compare this to Qwest, they went public at $18 with a book value per share of $.185, a 100 times book value multiple. Qwest has risen to over $70 since November 1997!!! I think they approved the 3 for 1 split to get the book value down to a lower value to support a multiple of book value that would put the price in the normal range of $18- $30 for IPO's. When you review other Internet stocks IPO S-3 filings ( check out the dilution section which is always included) Book value seems to be the dominant factor to consider. Earning are hard to consider as most, including Qwest had operating losses. Heck, some internet stocks are selling for 60 times revenues!!!!! Hope this helps. Time will tell how this all unfolds.