Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : GTIS - Will it be a Phoenix or not ? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: V. who wrote (1596)	2/28/1998 12:20:00 PM
From: 4-UR-Eyes-Only	Respond to of 2319

Second Opinion: Raised to "BUY" ; to "LONG" from "NEUTRAL" 207.53.33.62

To: V. who wrote (1596)	2/28/1998 2:03:00 PM
From: Robert Floyd	Respond to of 2319

Victoria, I really suspect your last message will fall on deaf ears.

To: V. who wrote (1596)	3/1/1998 4:18:00 PM
From: Scott Miller	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2319

>>> I am very educated with regard to what constitutes insider information...To say that you will not leak insider information on the one hand, then to insinuate or imply in other posts that you would've or could've revealed inside info to this board had we "appreciated" your value to us as you perceive it to be is really not the issue. <<< One... last... time... My very first post stated clearly--or so I thought <g>--that I would not reveal insider information, but that I would give inside info that may not be publicly available simply because we've not made it so. I've never said I would reveal "insider info." Perhaps using the phrase "inside info" was too much to overcome, even with my pre-emptive explanation. Perhaps I should have made myself more clear by using the phrase "behind-the-scenes info," instead, since I should've realized that "inside info" is too hard to separate from "insider info." Lesson learned: Never underestimate the ability of some people to relentlessly misunderstand statements such that they serve their own purpose. <g> By the way, about your long posts to me, I don't read beyond the first few paragraphs. My attention span for your written speeches cannot be sustained. Sorry. Just make sure you write like a reporter, with all the key facts in the first two paragraphs. I would hate to think you're spending more than a few minutes on those mini-novels and here I am not even getting the intended benefit from them. ;) Scott Miller Apogee