To: Gutterball who wrote (2322 ) 2/28/1998 1:32:00 PM From: don roberson Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6464
I thought I indicated that the jury was still out. I didn't say this was a sure thing. And I don't care if I impress you. I don't know who or what you are. Perhaps your posting is a infantile attempt to control or influence because you have no control or influence in your own life. Who knows. But if BAAT is successful, you'll come back on the otherside, to guide us as the stock rises. Telling us when to fold. but as others have noted. The suspicions toward you come because you only post here. Only perhaps two other stocks, but 98% of the time you post here. A vendetta perhaps? No one posts as a hobby. If you had many stocks you post at and come here periodically, that would give you more credibility than only posting here. People should be just as suspicious of your motivations, as you say people should be suspicious of Joes company. You preach from shaky grounds, because you have not formed a base of credibility. You can take any stock, no matter what it is, and find negatives, and put doubts in peoples mind, whether its competition, fundamentals, etc. Because no matter how good the stock. Coke, Disney, IBM, etc. Their meteoric rise could not have been predicted by anyone. Its events along the way that made them so successful. Anyone in stocks knows this. You can't look back at "high risers" and ask yourself why you didn't see it. Its because "it" wasn't there. The dynamics of a company come in increments. You also do not know all that BAAT is. People that are in it, are taking a gamble. A gamble on the future. Not on the "facts" of today. Long term investors buy on a bet that the company will do greater things in the future. Thats why your postings are clueless. We are not here by the "facts" alone. We are here, betting that the technology will expand, and applicaitons will expand, and BAAT will climb on future unknowns. CEO Indeed. HA.