Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TREND1 who wrote (29133)	3/1/1998 2:53:00 AM
From: Skeeter Bug	Respond to of 53903

larry, of course i'm never against a profit. however, you know as well as i that nobody knew this stock was going to $39 except maybe the dolts that used opm to get it there. i don't bet against reality. reality is that people invest to receive a return on their money - which mu hasn't provided and will not provide for the foreseeable future. apparently, this isn't obvious to many people. yet. suppose someone went long at $22 on a stock they believed to be valued at $13 - and i'm being kind. they wake up the next day and it is fair valued at $13. now that would be dumb. it could have happened if mu management didn't stuff unnecessary product down muei's throat and then made some song and dance about korea possibly being out of inventory. yeah, right ;-) i'm playing this baby back down to the teens. you all laugh now. i can't control dolts spending opm on a crap stock. i can tell you emphatically that when business sucks over the longer term the stock will probably follow. even after this run up mu is down about 65% from its high. why? it is a loser. an erratic loser, but a loser none the less. we will se the teens b/c that is where this bowser belongs and you won't see any holdbacks anymore - which was the ONLY reason mu ever made more than $0.20 in eps.