SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : American Eco (ECGOF, ECX on Toronto exchange) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JimieA who wrote (1825)3/1/1998 9:04:00 AM
From: Harry_Behemoth  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2841
 
Thanks for the info. Very informative.

Regarding Point 1, I think the tacit assumption was that DBCO could earn enough to offset the added 6.3 million shares, or around $10 million for $1.50/share. McConnell Dowell (60% owned by DBCO?) by itself should make over $20 million before taxes.



To: JimieA who wrote (1825)3/1/1998 2:07:00 PM
From: Duncan  Respond to of 2841
 
Jim:

Great post. NOL's are complicated animals...and the tax code changes all the time. When I have a little more time, I too will try and add a few thoughts on NOL usage when a change of control occurs.

As for your comment
<<3. Generally when there is a acquisition via the purchase method there is goodwill created. Especially since ECO is paying over two times shareholders equity for DB. Some of this excess will probably be added to goodwill. In this case when the combined company uses the acquired NOLs, the tax benefit would reduce goodwill and not reduce income tax expense. >>

The 100% stock swap noted in the proposed DBCO acquisition, set at an exchange ratio of 5:1 will likely qualify for the "pooling of interests" acquistion accounting method..not the purchase method you note above. Pooling of interests requires many other issues to be met...which I won't address now. I'll wait to see how ECO's going to account for the transaction before I go off on an accounting diatribe...and put people to sleep.

There is a caveat, however, and perhaps a very real one too. If ECO calls the convertible promissory notes or intends to call the notes at $3, this transaction will be accounted for under the "purchase" rules.
Duncan



To: JimieA who wrote (1825)3/1/1998 11:32:00 PM
From: david james  Respond to of 2841
 
Jim,
Nice analysis of the NOLs. If they don't address this in the conference call tomorrow, I'll try and contact the CFO to see his take.
David