SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Somatogen (SMTG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: kha vu who wrote (429)3/2/1998 6:44:00 AM
From: Madharry  Respond to of 442
 
This deal has to be approved by the shareholders. The board IMHO has prove itself over time to be useless in protecting the interest of shareholders. I am sure that when we get the full terms of the deal we will find that Somatogen Senior Management are kept on and offered golden parachutes and that the board is also treated very well, as far as the shareholders who bought at the initial offering of $24 or those that bought at the secondary of $17-oops! I haven't heard any of the usual " the company has hired investment bankers to explore other alternatives" . Personally, I think the deal is ludicrously cheap. After all SMTG has something like $3 in cash. So I am voting no.



To: kha vu who wrote (429)3/3/1998 12:23:00 AM
From: Bharat H. Barai  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 442
 
That is correct, as I understand from Timothy Hoogheem, CFO and Nanita Wadell. Once the shreholders approve the deal, the Shareholder gets $9 worth of Baxter stock, plus royalties of upto $2/share (to shareholders of record on merger date), based on 5% of sales of Somatogen products.

Clearly, Baxter got a super steal. Somatogen was sold dirt cheap!! I am surprised that even Lilly signed on the deal.

Bharat H. Barai MD