Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rocky Reid who wrote (49131)	3/2/1998 12:01:00 AM
From: Spank	Respond to of 58324

Rocky, please provide support to your allegation that the Nomai tests were done by BIASED labs. Thank you, Spank

To: Rocky Reid who wrote (49131)	3/2/1998 10:11:00 AM
From: Cogito	Respond to of 58324

>>This whole episode should prove to be a very interesting battle. If Iomega wins, then they remain the same. If they lose, then the whole world collapses around them as more and more (and bigger) competitors, who up until now had been watching from the sidelines, dogpile into the Zip disc market.<< Rocky - Dogpile on the market? So now you're saying that the Zip disk market is huge and growing. Is that it? - Allen

To: Rocky Reid who wrote (49131)	3/2/1998 12:53:00 PM
From: stock bull	Respond to of 58324

Rocky, the court passing judgement on IOM's reliability tests is a joke. Reliability testing is a complex field, and the court would required an independent reliability consultant to pass "judgement" on the disk test data. This includes the test methods used to determine the reliability information. If the judge happened to be a qualified reliability engineer, then the judge would be qualified to proceed with a ruling and not use a consultant. However, I would think IOM would want the consultant (an expert witness). Stock Bull