Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David R. Schaller who wrote (8892)	3/2/1998 7:30:00 AM
From: Phil Jones	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14627

David: I hope the new results won't be too long in coming. This week?

To: David R. Schaller who wrote (8892)	3/2/1998 7:58:00 AM
From: Bill Jackson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14627

The twin data is somewhere, as it takes the same time to assay as RC holes. If these were for Lakefield labs to do a leahc test on they should have release preliminary assay data by this time. the question is why does barrick sit on this data?. It might be that since they got a report instead of a simple hole assay they can sit on it ad infinitum, whereas a DD hole assay they would have had to report. That would be a good question to aks Shrake, I will. Bill