Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rocky Reid who wrote (49177)	3/2/1998 4:58:00 PM
From: Alan Rosen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

Rocky, SPECULATION, SPECTULATION, SPECTULATION..... .....you don't know what the "court" thought or why it ruled the way it ruled. .....you don't know what the status of Click! is or what products it will be ultimately incorporated into. .....you don't know if the alleged problems in IOM products are any worst than any other electronic/mechanical device..... ....SPECULATION, THAT IS ALL YOU HAVE TO SELL! archcc

To: Rocky Reid who wrote (49177)	3/2/1998 7:16:00 PM
From: Troy Shaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

Rocky, You just don't have a clue. <<Don't forget, part of the judge's ruling lifting the injunction was stated to the effect of Zip drive failure did not need the presence of Nomai discs to occur. The drives and discs failed even with Iomega Brand discs only.>> This is as valid as saying "Zip drive failure due to inserting a wedge into the drive with a hammer isn't pertinent, because the drives and disks fail even with Iomega brand disks." The failure rate of Iomega's drives with Iomega brand disks versus Nomai disks are orders of magnitude apart. One more thing, computer disks are spelled with a "k".