SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications-News Only!!! (ASND) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dennis R. Duke who wrote (1240)3/2/1998 5:50:00 PM
From: Jurgen  Respond to of 1629
 
Net Via Cable: It's Fast, But Hard To Find
Date: 3/2/98
Author: Paul Korzeniowski

Larry Marion, president of Triangle Publishing Services Inc. in Newton, Mass., was a frustrated Internet user.

Marion relied on America Online Inc. of Dulles, Va., for Internet access. But AOL was having trouble keeping pace with Triangle's rapidly growing use of the Internet. Busy signals were plentiful when Marion tried to log on, and bandwidth was too scant for transmitting pictures or graphics.

So Marion turned to another source for help - his local cable television supplier, US West MediaOne Inc. Instantly, he got the extra speed and bandwidth his company needed.

''The faster transmission speed saves me half an hour a day, and the extra bandwidth enables me to exchange pictures and graphics files,'' Marion said.

Because of deregulation, cable TV companies now have the green light to offer Internet service. Using modems designed to operate on cable TV lines, these suppliers can offer speeds of 1.5 megabits per second, 25 times as fast as what dial-up services like AOL offer.

There's one big catch: You may not be able to find cable Internet service. And it may stay that way for a long time. It is now offered in relatively few cities. About 100,000 subscribers have signed up.

Cable TV companies face several hurdles in increasing their service reach. The communications equipment that delivers a cable TV signal was built for one-way connectivity - with the local operator sending information to customers.

To offer Internet access, these service providers need to upgrade their equipment to support two-way communications. That represents a major investment and requires the companies to install new lines.

Lisa Pelgrim, senior analyst with Dataquest Inc. in San Jose, Calif., estimates only 20% of existing cable TV lines could support two-way communications. The rest will have to be built from scratch.

Another problem is that cable companies initially targeted residential areas for their services. Consequently, they may not offer Internet access in business districts. But that problem is expected to disappear eventually, companies say.

''Corporations are always searching for higher-speed network connections for telecommuters and small branch offices, so cable Internet access providers are looking more closely at the business market,'' said Karl May, vice president and general manager of broadband technology for Santa Clara, Calif.-based Bay Networks Inc.

There are other hopeful signs.

David Fellows, senior vice president of Internet engineering and operations at US West, says Newton was the first city where his company offered the service, in '96. During the past year, the firm expanded its service to 200 cities. Fellows expects to add another 60 during the next few months.

Cable TV suppliers have tried to price their services aggressively, but charges are still well above those of dial-up services. For cable modem service, you typically pay $150 for the initial installation and then a flat monthly charge of $40 to $50. That compares with no installation fee and a $20 monthly charge for dial-up services.

But cable operators point out that they don't tie up your phone lines. If you get an extra dedicated phone line, it could cost up to $50 a month in some regions, depending on use. That's in addition to the one-time installation fee of $75 to $100.

You should be aware of two potential pitfalls with cable. First, you may need to upgrade your computer. Triangle Publishing's Marion started out with eight megabytes of memory on his PC but quickly upgraded to 48 megabytes to keep pace with the faster file transfers.

Second, if cable service is going to be for a network, a compatibility problem could arise. Cable modem suppliers have been battling over how their devices should package information. Compatibility problems between different vendors' modems means you may have to pay $300 to $400 for a modem that works.

Vendors have moved to solve this problem. In the fall, they agreed on standards so different modems can package information in a consistent manner. Uniform standards could reduce prices by 25%, officials say.

Competition may also bring price cuts. Four top network equipment suppliers have entered the cable modem market - Bay; Cabletron Systems Inc., of Rochester, N.H.; Cisco Systems Inc. of San Jose, Calif.; and 3Com Corp. of Santa Clara, Calif. Motorola Inc. of Schaumburg, Ill., a leading conventional modem supplier, also is participating.

There also may be more competition from traditional Internet access providers. Dial-up modem makers continually increase system speeds. Telephone companies are showing interest in providing Digital Subscriber Line service, an emerging technology that offers performance comparable to a cable modem.

Dataquest's Pelgrim expects most organizations will continue to rely on dial-up modems during the short term. But if you need higher-speed access, cable Internet access represents an enticing option - provided it's available.



To: Dennis R. Duke who wrote (1240)3/2/1998 5:55:00 PM
From: Jurgen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1629
 
Web Access Providers Weave A Tangled Payment Structure
Date: 3/2/98
Author: Pete Barlas

Does improving Internet service mean higher fees for customers? Yes, say analysts and industry executives.

In '97, the 13 largest Internet service providers cut customer connection problems by half, says a January study by Inverse Network Technology Inc., a Sunnyvale, Calif., research firm.

Referring to its costs to improve service, Dulles, Va.-based America Online Inc., the nation's largest ISP, last month said it will raise its monthly flat- rate fee by $2 to $21.95. That starts in April.

Also starting that month, IBM Corp.'s Global Services, which provides ISP service, says it will add an hourly charge of $1.95 on top of its monthly rate of $19.95 for all Web usage over 100 hours a month.

Analysts expect to see more price hikes soon.

''There was a collective sigh of relief when AOL raised its prices, because everyone in the industry has struggled,'' said Greg Wester, an analyst with Yankee Group, a Boston-based market researcher.

That struggle shows on the bottom line. Only two publicly held companies whose primary business is to provide Internet service have ever posted a quarterly profit. They are AOL and Atlanta-based MindSpring Enterprises Inc.

Since late '96, when AOL joined the trend, flat-rate pricing of $19.95 a month has been nearly universal.

''There is no reason to believe that the $19.95 rate is going to live in perpetuity,'' Wester said. ''This is an industry that is cash-starved.''

AT&T Corp.'s WorldNet Service, Concentric Network Corp., Erols Internet Inc. , WorldCom Inc.'s GridNet International, MCI Communications Corp., Microsoft Corp. and MindSpring were among the ISPs providing the best service in '97, says the study by Inverse. And they all spent money to improve.

Inverse rated ISPs on the number of busy signals and disconnections it encountered when logging on to the various services.

The study found that ISP customer connection problems in the less-busy, daytime hours dropped from 13.2% in January '97 to 5.2% in December. That means nearly 95% of all Web surfers got online during their first attempt in December, while about one in six failed to do so in January.

The percentage of customers failing to get on the Web in the busier, evening hours fell from 25.5% to 7.9%, says Inverse.

AOL had the biggest improvement. It had an 80% failure rate in January, but only 15% in December, the study says.

The improvements show a maturing industry that's responding to customer demand, says Bobbi Murphy, Inverse's vice president of marketing.

''People are pressing ISPs to act more like a utility provider,'' she said.

AOL spent more than $700 million last year upgrading its service. For example, it added 25,000 modems per month to handle more traffic.

AOL spokeswoman Wendy Goldberg says the rate hike is needed to cover higher costs stemming from more use.

AOL has added about 3 million subscribers over the last 18 months. And customers are spending more time on the Web - an average of 50 minutes a day, from only 13 minutes in '96, says Goldberg.

Other ISPs are spending to improve service. Concentric spent $20 million on improvements last year, up from less than $7 million in '96.

The result: Concentric says its customer connection rate during evening hours is 94.1%. In the daytime, it says its success rate is 97%. It says both rates are 2% better than the industry average.

''We have to spend money to grow our network,'' said John Peters, Concentric's executive vice president and general manager of network services. ''Our goal is to maintain that performance.''

Given costs, Peters says Concentric is reviewing possible rate hikes. It still charges the flat fee of $19.95 a month.

''We always felt that the $19.95 price model was unsustainable,'' he said.

AT&T WorldNet in Basking Ridge, N.J., says it spent millions of dollars last year to improve its network. As a result, it cut the number of times users got busy signals from 8% to 4% during daylight hours, says company Vice President Dan Schulman.

Schulman says AT&T also is reviewing its rates.

''We are always evaluating the price- to-value mix,'' said Schulman. ''Most of the ISPs are looking at the price-to-value proposition and making decisions on it.''

IBM's rate hike also stems from more costs. Last year, IBM tripled its modem count. At the same time, its subscribers doubled to about 500,000.

''Our focus is to provide a quality service so that people don't get a busy signal,'' said IBM spokeswoman Linda Wizner.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



To: Dennis R. Duke who wrote (1240)3/2/1998 5:56:00 PM
From: Jurgen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1629
 
3Com To Thrive In 56K World, Benhamou Says
Date: 3/2/98
Author: Michele Hostetler

Now that the industry standard for 56K modem technology is on the books, 3Com Corp. plans to hit the remote-access networking market with force in '98.

Santa Clara, Calif.-based 3Com purchased modem maker U.S. Robotics Inc. for $6.6 billion last summer to increase its push into this hot market. Modems are used to connect far-flung computer users to central networks.

But the lack of a standard stymied the market last year, causing lackluster growth. Two opposing camps eventually reached an accord on Feb. 5 by combining two technologies. They called the resulting standard V.pcm.

The new standard is expected to boost sales of access concentrators, which are banks of modems. The devices are considered key to the overall market for remote access, the linking of two distant networks.

Eric Benhamou, 3Com's chief executive, recently discussed with IBD how the new standard will affect the networking industry.

IBD:

How has the new 56K modem standard changed the way 3Com does business?

Benhamou:

What this means is that I think this will basically enable the market to move to 56K. It sends a very reassuring signal to the enterprise community (large corporate accounts) that had really not jumped on the 56K bandwagon until they were assured the standard was going to be there. For 3Com specifically, it's excellent news because it will enable us to consolidate market-share gain in the 56K arena. It's been the most popular standard by a wide margin.

We believe as the whole market moves more fully and more broadly to 56K with the V.pcm standard, (3Com) will end up in a stronger position than we had before. We have a different architectural approach to building modems than our competitors. We use DSP (digital signal processing) technology in all of our intellectual properties that are embodied in the code. This gives us great flexibility and time-to-market advantage. This is why we are expected to be the first company with V.pcm-standard product.

IBD:

How will you transition your customers to the new technology?

Benhamou:

We feel that we can basically move from the X2 level to the V.pcm level with relatively few changes in our code. It's a very painless migration. It's basically a free software upgrade.

IBD:

How will the new standard change the remote-access market?

Benhamou:

I'm not sure how much of an effect it will have on the remote-access market in terms of numbers of ports (connections). But certainly the types of ports that companies are deploying will change dramatically. Again, we feel as if we have a time-to-market advantage. The modems we have on the remote-access side are essentially the same as the modems we have on the subscriber side. Our larger (Internet service provider) customers will have the (new standard) modem technology in the next few days or weeks. I think this will set the pace for the upgrade in the entire industry.

IBD:

Last year, the remote-access market didn't grow as fast as expected. What's the outlook now?

Benhamou:

We think this market will continue to be a high-growth market. There has been a lowering of the growth this past year, primarily because the industry moved (to putting more modems in access concentrators) without really increasing prices very much. This means the price per (network connection) took a big dive. There was fairly rapid erosion last year.

This year I don't expect to see that kind of dramatic price erosion, but there will be some. The market is strategic and hotly contested. We expect the remote-access market will probably grow in the 25%-to-30% range for the industry. Obviously we expect that we will benefit more than most from the V.pcm upgrades. We have an opportunity to grow faster than the marketplace.

IBD:

How do remote-access products help 3Com's push into large corporate accounts?

Benhamou:

A portion of the remote-access market is in the enterprise segment. For example, if you take 3Com as a company, we actually run our own remote-access program. Our telecommuters and our people who access our network from the field when we travel . . . all of this is done using a remote-access system we own and manage.

Some companies choose to outsource it to an ISP or to a carrier. But we choose to do it ourselves, and there's a fair amount of companies that do that too. I would say 20% to 25% of the remote-access segment are basically enterprise customers and three-quarters or more are ISPs and carriers. Remote access is in fact an important aspect of enterprise business.



To: Dennis R. Duke who wrote (1240)3/3/1998 6:33:00 PM
From: Maverick  Respond to of 1629
 
GRF400 is used in San Diego, Boulder, Champaign to build Internet2 backbone
zdnet.com