Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ClearSky who wrote (2602)	3/2/1998 7:46:00 PM
From: James Fulop	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

Excellent point. And if my memory serves me correctly, the magazine Wired featured an article last summer criticizing the analysts at these companies for being compensated by the frequency of quotes in the media. Hmmmmmm

To: ClearSky who wrote (2602)	3/2/1998 7:54:00 PM
From: Rande Is	Respond to of 18444

Seems wishy washy at best. . . good post, Jeanne. No doubt Jim Nail was interviewed only once by Wired. Yet they managed to pull a positive statement from him for the first article and a negative one for the second/third. That goes to show the power of editing and context. Makes you wonder if both positive and negative articles were written simultaneously. Now there is something worth investigating. Rande Is

To: ClearSky who wrote (2602)	3/2/1998 7:56:00 PM
From: BlackStar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

I'm not in the internet industry...are Forrester Research and Jupiter Communications industry heavyweights? Seems wishy washy at best (??? at worst) to "praise" a transaction then develop a strongly opposing opinion soon after. Nail, hammer, bulls eye. I was preparing a commentary to the articles but thought the better of it. They're basically good I guess. That point was the one that stuck out the most. The majority of the articles were actually spam, the type of spam OC only dreams of authoring.