Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cogito who wrote (49198)	3/2/1998 10:35:00 PM
From: Michael Coley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

RE: Old Posts. >> To go back to any post on this thread since the very first one, just type in the number of the post in the "Reply #### of 48,987" box at the top of any other post. Then press Enter. You'll go right to that post. << Right, although I think there were some issues about this not working for some browsers. You can also get there from #subject-595-Range-0 . Another thing that you can't forget while reading older posts is that they are pre-split prices. You have to divide to get the equivalent price from today. For simple reference, here's the divisors for the various date ranges: Before 11/23/94: 15 11/23/94 - 1/31/96: 12 2/1/96 - 5/20/96: 4 5/21/96 - 12/22/97: 2 Reading message #1 in the thread (#reply-4239), the cost basis of $23 and the sale price of $30 sounds high, but it's equivalent to $2 and $2.50. (I wonder if that guy is kicking himself for selling at $2.50?) It's fun to read through those old messages and see the thinking back then. It's amazing how close they were on some things and how off-base they were on others (bulls and bears alike). - Michael Coley - wwol.com