SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jwk who wrote (49213)3/3/1998 12:56:00 AM
From: Naggrachi  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
You bring a good point regarding the $6 EPS.

<<Back then SI was free and anybody could show up and post any number they wanted. Much better now doncha' think! <g> >>

Things aren't that different today, you still have cRocky cluttering this thread with his nonsense.

No matter how much things change, they're still the same.

One poster I'm glad is no longer around is that Joel character.

Zead



To: jwk who wrote (49213)3/3/1998 1:13:00 AM
From: Michael Coley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
RE: Ridiculous $6 EPS estimate?

The one you are talking about (#reply-6223) is from our own Ken Marcus. But just how rediculous was that $6 EPS for 1996? Split adjusted, IOM did something like $2.50 EPS in 1996. That's not that far off, considering that they did $0.10 the quarter before Ken made that prediction. The direction and trend was certainly correct.

- Michael Coley
- wwol.com


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News