Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MrCash who wrote (3736)	3/3/1998 8:52:00 PM
From: Investor2	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42834

RE: "How many of us are way overloaded in equities ..." I am. RE: "How many of us keep saying "let er ride just a bit more" before we reallocate some of our spectacular gains to fixed income?" I am. Best wishes, I2

To: MrCash who wrote (3736)	3/3/1998 9:20:00 PM
From: sea_biscuit	Respond to of 42834

Dippy: If Paula only got $100K, then she was underpaid. I imagine the magazines pay orders of magnitude more. Well, in this instance, it is not correct to say that Paula Jones was paid. She in fact, took the money that was intended for a specific purpose, i.e. to pay the lawyers who are fighting on her behalf. But then to her, money might be more important than "justice", huh?! Who knows? :-) As for the magazines, I don't know who will pay her $100K, but we can surely rule out "Playboy" and "Penthouse", right? ;-) Dipy.