Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ACRT about to move to new highs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan Packer who wrote (1988)	3/3/1998 11:14:00 AM
From: Andrew Q. Viet	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7054

John Chew did publish the default rate a while ago. It's something like .01% ( if I remember correctly). I think he posted on this thread. go back and look for it if you are curious.

To: Dan Packer who wrote (1988)	3/3/1998 11:21:00 AM
From: randy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7054

Please all of you (and the SEC if your listening Big Brother). I have read and posted on these boards for years. Why is it that I have seen over exaggerations to prop up and increase the value of a stock. Flat out lies about the value of a stock. Flat out lies about what companies will have a income. For example in the last few days there were posts on this thread that NASI has a cure for prostate cancer. This is untrue. Why is it that all of these posts go on without a word about breaking the law when we all know that they do help to add to the price of a stock. Then when as all of you accuse pink of doing the opposite you want his hide.

To: Dan Packer who wrote (1988)	3/3/1998 11:47:00 AM
From: Paul Weiss	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7054

Dan-- I'm trying real hard to keep an open mind about ACRT, I'd like to see how the trial develops. You have raised some very important questions that I'm hoping the Prosecuting Attorney will also ask. Now, I've two questions: 1. Who or where was it first floated that ACRT had zero defaults? 2. If you call a default by another name is it not really a default? Hmmmm. Regards, Paul