Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : YURI ( YURI SYSTEM ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Phoenix who wrote (721)	3/3/1998 1:37:00 PM
From: peter n matzke	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1181

Gary, have you ever heard of Rambus,Cisco etc very faulty logic

To: The Phoenix who wrote (721)	3/3/1998 4:31:00 PM
From: peter n matzke	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1181

Gary, i don't know why you insist on stating items which are untrue, but since you insist " I have been involved in a number of standards setting organizations and I can tell you that no company will back a technology for ratification if it is owned by a company that wishes to charge royalties. If YURI wishes to make Sub-T1 a reality then they will be much better off making this technology available to all vendors at no charge. " Your statement is incorrect. Many standards if not most, were created when the "property" of an individual or company was recognized as having value. This is easily proven in almost every industry from seed genetics to automobile wiper blades to computer operating systems etc. Companies back other companies and are willing to pay royalties to other companies because they have something of value which is recognized by the parties involved.