Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Royal International Venture RIL.V (was Labrador Int'l LAB) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Fix who wrote (327)	3/3/1998 2:18:00 PM
From: Don craig	Respond to of 3380

Fix: Do you think she will pop yet this week? By the way, I took up a moderate position this morning, so I'm jumping on the bandwagon now too. Good Luck Don

To: The Fix who wrote (327)	3/9/1998 12:49:00 AM
From: Ed Pakstas	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3380

FIX: I'm beginning to believe there may be some truth to this rumour re: Teck/LAB... At the PDAC today I viewed a claims map that showed where all the Teck drill holes were.. On the same map, which BTW Teck has supplied to DML, there where 2 claims (one which is JV'd with DML)that had grid patterns drawn on them... When I questioned the individual regarding these grids on the LAB and the MGJ properties, it was explained to me that they put these grids (which BTW are to scale) on the maps prior to conducting Gravity Surveys...They then overlay the Gravity Surveys on top of these grids which are in turn then numbered and are used for obtaining drill permits and identifying drill sites... These same grids appear on the MGJ map of the Gravity Surveys... majorgeneral.com One thing I'm keeping in mind: TECK SUPPLIED THE MAP which leads me that the closest that DML is going to get is the DML's association with GBR... BONUS 5 Message 3336549 That's it for tonight... ...ed