Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: s. bateh who wrote (49245)	3/3/1998 8:57:00 PM
From: Naggrachi	Respond to of 58324

Should we expect BUZ oem'ed any time soon or is that too much to ask? How is BUZ moving, anyways? Zead Exactly how many of Jaz2 have arived?

To: s. bateh who wrote (49245)	3/3/1998 9:22:00 PM
From: BBG	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 58324

>>>All: with all the good news coming from ingram and merisel on sales<<< Man, this is starting to sound a lot like Q4 97... "Selling like hotcakes, Xmas season, Flying off the shelves... etc... Don't get me wrong all of that info. is great to read about and I believe that eventually all of these astronomical sales numbers, huge market shares, etc... will translate into higher stock value but I guess I've gotten kicked in the teeth too many times to let myself believe that "something" won't screw up what "should" be another fantastic quarter... One thing in our favor this Q is that IMO expectations have been lowered enough so that it won't take a stellar, blowout, Q to boost our little "problem child"... and... on the other hand if the Q is merely more of the same... i.e. K.E. "managing" the results down to just meet expectations... the stock won't tank like it did Q4 '97.... Anyway FWIW let's all take it easy with the "superlatives" this Q and keep expectations, whisper numbers, etc... where they belong... LOW Ciao... Ya'll JD