Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : ESVS vs DCLK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe Copia who wrote (443)	3/4/1998 11:20:00 AM
From: Fitz	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 717

Joe Welcome to FAMH. This has been my ace in the hole since December 97. I'm going to stay long on this one. Played BAAT,NETZ & a fee others, but FAMH is a no brainer IMO. In all honesty, this is the only one I don't lose any sleep over. Regards, Fitz

To: Joe Copia who wrote (443)	3/4/1998 11:27:00 AM
From: Bill Monahan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 717

OFF TOPIC Hey FAMH is dropping like a stone - whats up there?

To: Joe Copia who wrote (443)	3/4/1998 11:48:00 AM
From: Rande Is	Respond to of 717

OT> Perhaps FAMH has a chance at making to the big time. LTGL also does. But after yesterday's incredible news for both companies, why are their stock prices slipping? I had to sell FAMH after holding it just 2 days to keep a profit. I also had to sell 2/3 of LTGL for same reason. I guess they are both searching for a bottom. But on this sort of news? It does not make sense. LTGL [supposedly a family operation] has been averaging 10 million shares a day and can't budge it's price. FAMH should have been the 'play of the day' today. That brings up the question of dillution. There seems to be an endless supply of shares to both of these companies. What happened to buying up the float and forcing the price up because the MMs don't have any shares left? I just don't see that happening anywhere. OK, maybe LAAQ earlier this week on no volume. But that appears to be a blatnet bait and switch manouver. As soon as volume comes in watch the price sit there. And their "Seen on TV" logo is merely a rip-off of the "AS seen on TV" logo which, I believe is public domain, and countless companies use. Which brings me full circle. I want one company that is more interested in selling their product than selling their shares. Decency and ethics . . . are these words completely foreign to the penny stock world? NETZ financials will no doubt go the way of MDCE "SEC filed" . . .today, yesterday, no today, no tomorrow, no next week, we mean next month . . .financials, which was only in their minds. I bought NETZ at .20 so I did fine, but I am sick about those that came in at +.80. Joe, did you read my post regarding possible action against NETZ I wrote to Matty? Their are some interesting possibilities there for someone that is so inclined. It is on other thread. I will let you know if my search for one decent company yeilds anything. Rande Is