Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : DSC Communications -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MBogdaniec who wrote (3737)	3/4/1998 7:59:00 PM
From: chuck	Respond to of 4429

to all; i think the major problem here is no news from digi. now if i was to believe previous responses alot of minor news items may signal problems so maybe this is a contranian indicator. i jumped on again today at 18 3/8. so now i bought at 24 5/8. 22 1/16/ 19 3/16, 18 and 18 3/8. throughout the last two weeks i have not sold and holding for a major move up. last two times digi was at this level big money came in and moved the stock up to the 20-20.5 area. i hope this trend repeats itself for all the longs sake. even though i subscribe to the don't catch a knife when it is falling, i believe it is digi's time. unfortunately intel came out with a shocker and now we are all going to be sucked into the great pit of selling, i should of waited another day to buy. to those who didn,t, tommorrow should be a good opportunity to buy digi lower.

To: MBogdaniec who wrote (3737)	3/4/1998 8:03:00 PM
From: Moe Damghani	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4429

MB, hold on backing up the truck until the dust settles. I spoke to the company today, I have been trying to get a hold of them for two weeks now and left them Seven messages. They finally returned the call today and said that today's action is related to the UBS comments on the recent hardware problems that caused outage. I asked them if DSC's equipment was involved and he said he prefers not to comment on that. He mentioned that the UBS guy made his own conclusion. I asked again that if the company heard anything from the customer telling them that DSC's equipment was at fault. The answer was that he prefers not to comment on that. My conclusion from the conversation was that DSC's equipment was involved because he never denied it. Otherwise, why wouldn't he come out saying that it was not our equipment. This company does not do a thing to protect the small investor and they could care less about them. Why should it take me Seven times to call them before they return the call? They have only two guys working in the Investor relations and one of them is always out. The Investor Relations does not communicate properly with the investors and that is part of the problem. On a volatile stock such as this one they could mention the news to the person who answers the phone to at least inform the investors of what's going on. Instead, the secretary says I don't know and I have someone call you. Well, by the time you hear back from them you've probably got so frustrated and dumped the stock. I really believe that they behave very poorly with the individual investors and the analysts get all the attention. They should cut down 1% of Donold's salary and add two more guys to the investor relations department. Aren't you glad you asked MB!!!

To: MBogdaniec who wrote (3737)	3/4/1998 8:43:00 PM
From: Moe Damghani	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4429

Looks like another bad day for all of the technology stocks tomorrow! Intel was halted after hours trading due to 1Q profits warning which is taking the whole Japan's NIKIE average down below 17000.