To: Czechsinthemail who wrote (13665 ) 3/5/1998 1:36:00 PM From: Chuzzlewit Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95453
Baird, I have to disagree with you. The Barron's article said: "In April and May, many contracts for drilling rigs are coming up for renewal -- nearly 33% of Gulf jackup rigs, in fact [the kind that are towed and set up in relatively shallow water]. When that happens, the exploration & production (E&P) companies that use contract drillers to extract oil for them will undoubtedly try to cut better deals because of the declines in crude prices that have already occurred. Generally, the lower the price of oil, the lower the day rates drillers can command for their services. "As a result, Maat estimates that E&P company operating cash flows will fall by 15% in 1998. And the pressure to negotiate lower day rates will be even stronger on the smaller independent operators, whose projects are more sensitive to the price of oil. The upshot: with lower day rates, the drillers could be hurt more than Wall Street is expecting." Historically, day rates have varied with the availability of jack-ups. I believe that the evidence to date indicates that the day rates are continuing to climb, although not as rapidly as they had. Perhaps Maat might make a better case if he correlated the profit per bbl (which includes the extraction and exploration costs) to the day rates. In any event, we know just how volatile the price of oil is, and we also know that oil will increase in cost as time goes by, so even using Maat's argument we would expect day rates to escalate over the years. But this argument has been rebutted by several industry insiders who point out that day rates are much more sensitive to the aggregate demand in bbls then they are to the price of a barrel. One thing we can certainly agree on -- the stock market seems to be focused on the price of oil. Regards, Paul