SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Diana Schilke who wrote (13360)3/5/1998 7:27:00 AM
From: Moonray  Respond to of 22053
 
Diana, thanx for passing on the Boardwatch URL. I greatly
enjoyed the modem and "Modem War" history. I had hoped that we had
seen the last of the Modem Wars, but this part says otherwise:

The result is that we will have interoperable modems compliant
with the V.90 specification and able to talk to each other. But it
appears that large disparities in achievable connection speeds will
depend on which client modem you are using, and which server modem
you connect to. Our testing would indicate these disparities may be
enormous - far beyond anything we've seen with previous modem
standards. In the previous round of V.34, the Rockwell chipset was
ubiquitous and modem performance was fairly level across the
universe of available modems. V.34 was basically V.34. In the coming
world of V.90, we would expect to see an almost implausible range of
operating performance from modems all purporting to be V.90
compatible. We'll have a standard, but it won't be very standard
with regard to performance.


So, I guess it's time for x2ers to don their battle gear and get it
on once again. The next battle would appear to be one of Modem
Throughput (or empty battle). The V.90 empty battle
starts with 3COM taking the early lead (as was the case a year ago)
and it is theirs to lose. Will the cheaper ROK/LU modems win out
over the higher quality (and faster) 3COM modems? Stay tuned.

By the way, the only statement I disagreed with was in the second
paragraph: "It seems a large body of the population simply refuses
to devote their lives to the Internet."
How can this be? Surely
no one on this thread! We've got to reign in these wayward deviates
and get them to devote their full time.<g>

o~~~ O



To: Diana Schilke who wrote (13360)3/5/1998 9:08:00 AM
From: David Lawrence  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 22053
 
That was an excellent Boardwatch article. Thanks for posting the link, Diana. You caught Derek sleeping on the job. <g>

Once again the FUD is cleared away and we see the truth!