SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: soup who wrote (9124)3/5/1998 10:10:00 AM
From: Doren  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 213173
 
Soup,

You (we) have to wonder what the qualifications of these journalists are? Probably related to the producer. Althought this Rose guy is the darling of intellectuals, I've always considered him to be a 'puffball'. Personally I like Stuttering John. Anybody see his interview with Clintons girlfriend? Hilarious, and revealing.

Most journalists keep the questions polite in order to gain access to their buddies, who they have lunch with. Panderers.

It wasn't worth watching. Pure propoganda.
The wonderful Gates bringing the Codex to a museum near you...

Most people think Gates is a genius coder, most don't know he bought Dos. Probably includes Rose.

Doren



To: soup who wrote (9124)3/5/1998 4:34:00 PM
From: Phillip C. Lee  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 213173
 
Soup,

I love to see how much Apple's revenue comes at the Intc's expense
too.

Well, today's outcome in tech stocks seems to pretty match what I
expected this morning. Apple's still a winner, down 3/8 with volume
of over 6m (loss of 1.53%), and the final force of snapping back will
provide continuing rally tomorrow morning. Intc is a big loser, down
near 11 points (about 12.51% loss), Dell was down 7 points (with
5.04% loss), Msft was down 2 1/4 (with 2.73% loss), IBM was down
1/16 (if combined yersterday's loss, <2%).

It is obvious Apple's the one to choose no matter in what condition.

Phil



To: soup who wrote (9124)3/5/1998 5:37:00 PM
From: Edward Boghosian  Respond to of 213173
 
Charlie Rose is not much of an intellect. His questioning is not very cutting. If you want to make a presence, your PR guy can get you on.
Great for 2nd or 3rd level exposure.

Ed