SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Wind River going up, up, up! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: carolyn walder who wrote (2845)3/5/1998 1:41:00 PM
From: Snowshoe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10309
 
** OT ** - HTML

Carolyn, in Netscape you can select "Document Source" from the "View" pulldown menu to see the background html for any web page you are looking at. It's an easy way to figure out how people are putting in italics and the like.

P.S. I hear that Gates is going to hire 5,000 - 10,000 programmers over the next two years. With that army he could create a Tornado alternative before breakfast. Yikes! Guess I better sell some of my 40,000 shares of WIND... <wink, wink>



To: carolyn walder who wrote (2845)3/5/1998 2:05:00 PM
From: J. Kerner  Respond to of 10309
 
Carolyn,

I guess we will just have a difference of opinion on this one. I think that the big investors who push the stock are looking at future earnings, not past earnings. I can give you a hundred examples of transactions similar to Wind where investors looked beyond one time earnings charges. I can also refer to a number of companies that are trading at astronomical PEs because earnings 2-3 years in the future are thought to be promising. The more certain future earnings are, the higher the trailing PE will look.

Anyway, let's both hope that the stock gets past its current doldrums and tracks the growth the company is experiencing.

P.S. It's nice to see the thread getting lively again!

Regards,
Jason



To: carolyn walder who wrote (2845)3/6/1998 8:30:00 PM
From: Joe Smith  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10309
 
Where do you see this PE of 210+ reported? Everywhere I look, the PE is based on earnings without the write-off. In my experience, some of the lesser-known periodicals will make the mistake of using the loss in the earnings, but even they mend their ways within a short period of time.