Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Chapman who wrote (12284)	3/5/1998 4:52:00 PM
From: Tim J. Flick	Respond to of 31646

The event that sticks in my mind the most at the moment was the fellow that came on this thread about a month ago that said "contract/engagement announcements would NOT have much of an effect on the stock". WRONG! Stock traded great but was cautious near the close with the civilian unemployment numbers tomorrow. Another new high!! this Coke announcement will make alot of people/institutions perk up. Keep em coming Mr. Jenkins!!

To: John Chapman who wrote (12284)	3/5/1998 5:27:00 PM
From: eleebee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

To all, Since it was too much to look up and refute Richard S.'s "arguments I sent E-mail to Scott Liolios--his response SMLeb wrote: > Dear Scott, > It is my understanding that you are familiar with the TAVA thread on > Silicon > Investor. > A Richard Schoenstadt makes some statements on reply#12194 that need > to be refuted. Please read this and respond to his claims. I feel that you > are in > the best position to respond since everyone else is guessing > Sincerely, > SMLeb@aol.com Hello SMLeb@aol.com Thank you for the heads up on the silicon thread. As busy as it has been lately, I have not had much of a chance to review that thread. However, I will not respond directly to the comments made by richard. He is entitled to his opinion. However his information for the most part is incorrect. His dates are off, his numbers are off, and his assumptions are off. If you would like to call me and I will gladly update you verbally. But to spend any significant time responding to his misinformation in writing would be counter productive when I need the time to tell my institutions what the signing of Coca-Cola means to the company. However, I do find it interesting that he thought the stock might go lower today. On the other hand maybe he is brilliant. Maybe he knows something Coca-Cola, Bristol-Myers, Cargil, Kraft, Unilever, Sun Oil, Dupont-Merck, General Motors, Ivax, Kennecott, R.W. Beck, Wonderware, TRW, Pillsbury and the US Mint haven't figured out yet. Please remember one thing. As I have said before: I personally believe we are only touching the ear of the elephant. Thanks for your support. You are a valued shareholder. P.S. I sent him a second note today stating that the Coca-Cola news answered the question. As you see his reply was very prompt and he wrote his note before getting mine. In my book he is O.K. Mark > > > > > > > >