Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Broken_Clock who wrote (13848)	3/5/1998 6:07:00 PM
From: Bazmataz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 95453

Bob Pissssssani on CNBC saying oils were very weak at the close. What an ultra-moron. Why not say they held up very well and even showed strength as money flew to earnings stability? Motorola warning should make tomorrow even more interesting.... BC

To: Broken_Clock who wrote (13848)	3/5/1998 8:40:00 PM
From: SJS	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95453

Look at the bigger picture for uno-segundo. It's gona hurt no matter what. Tech stocks are everywhere. Mutual funds own a boat-load, your IRA probably does, too. I am not happy about this because it portends the possibility for a lack of leadership in the market. I don't think oil's strong enough to be a leader now. Nor the banks, or drugs. Tech's been the thoroughbred, and frankly it's done a darn good job for the last 3 years. While I may not own MOT, or INTC, or CSCO directly now, my IRA's do. Frankly, I like the tech's in leadership position even if we get some spillover. I don't want the gunsights on oil...