Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: go4it who wrote (30874)	3/5/1998 7:46:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Charles, Robert may have a good point. Maxam has significantly improved assay result using reverse circulation drilling compared to previous results from auger drilling. I don't recall, were the IPM assay results from auger or reverse circulation drilling?

To: go4it who wrote (30874)	3/5/1998 8:02:00 PM
From: BillyZoom	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

If the average non COC numbers for the 1st sq km down to 100 ft were 0.046 via auger drilling and we now know via the Bateman independent verification COC FA that trench samples vs auger samples are at least 2.5 (.061/.022) times the value of auger samples then isn't it logical to surmise that the true average FA value of the dirt with no loss via auger drilling would be closer to 2.5 times the .046 or roughly 0.115 oz/t for the first sq km down to 100 ft. I realize this is purely simplistic speculation and is not intended as hype but the higher numbers seem blatantly obvious every time I analyze this play.