SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: M. Frank Greiffenstein who wrote (12298)3/5/1998 8:27:00 PM
From: C.K. Houston  Respond to of 31646
 
Doc,

<I don't want to post his letter, but he told me that he wanted his article to reflect the "rumblings" (his words) that TAVA was not for real.>

<I still don't agree that Cory wrote a fair article, but I have to respect him.>

Have to respect him? WHY????

I have NO engineering background. I'm self-taught when it comes to programming. I've done d*mn well in the market, with Y2K stocks ... cause I do SOOOOO much research.

My research is not just on specific companies and/or stocks - but the WHOLE picture. I have little patience with people who don't do the same. Especially lazy people who have a "following", and who others go to for direction or guidance.

I have NO respect for people who spread disinformation, because of "rumblings" .... and because they're too lazy to spend the time to learn otherwise.

Cheryl

P.S. While I've been very visible on the TAVA thread, anyone who has followed me, knows that fixing the "embedded systems" problem and building awareness of this issue is my primary objective. I have always welcomed competitors for TAVA. Much to other TAVA stockholder's dismay. But, it ain't gonna happen now. It's too late.



To: M. Frank Greiffenstein who wrote (12298)3/5/1998 9:38:00 PM
From: gamesmistress  Respond to of 31646
 
>>Cory Johnson wrote me back.....I don't want to post his letter,
>>but he told me that he wanted his article to reflect the
>>"rumblings" (his words) that TAVA was not for real.

"Rumblings?" Maybe Cory should tell Cramer to break out the Pepto-Bismol...

I really like TheStreet.com, because it offers so much for the individual investor on the inner workings of the market. BUT it is clear that none of the principal writers have a clue about the impact Y2K will have on businesses. Cramer looks at industries and story stocks but he has totally missed the boat on this one. Perhaps his attitude has rubbed off on Cory Johnson, who should know better, since he wrote that article on TPRO last year. And I do not respect a journalist who could write this about TAVA:

>>Essentially, what the company offers is a list of
>>devices that won't work after 2000 -- Tava doesn't fix them, it
>>doesn't replace them, but it will tell you what doesn't work.

Excuse me, but did he leave the room before the presentation was
over, or did he just not do his homework? This is Wrong! and
strains my belief in his credibility. It makes me wonder what his agenda is.



To: M. Frank Greiffenstein who wrote (12298)3/6/1998 12:20:00 AM
From: Jack Zahran  Respond to of 31646
 
DocStone, more likely that Cory was trying to get some favors with a few big investors who were short TAVA. The obvious is usually true. Cory knew better by the fact that he reported on this company. I think that is an indirect admision of intentional mis-information.



To: M. Frank Greiffenstein who wrote (12298)3/6/1998 12:48:00 AM
From: TokyoMex  Respond to of 31646
 
Yes he wrote about TAVA at my urging last year ,,at the time I told him I would cut his ^#%s off if he wrote anything bad.... I also introduced him to CEO and CFO... at the Cruttenden,, also emed to ceo and cfo of his coming to the conference in NY so they would be aware..
On that occassion too he left early ,,and I was relieved that the piece was favourable...

Still as a drinking buddy and especially as a journalist he was very irresponsible and dissappointing ..

Joe



To: M. Frank Greiffenstein who wrote (12298)3/6/1998 11:25:00 PM
From: Zebra 365  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 31646
 
Cory Johnson.... Two faces, no waiting.

The SAME Cory Johnson that wrote this for TheStreet.Com in August, 1997 ???......

$10 Store: Why TPRO May Go, Go, Go

By Cory Johnson
Staff Reporter

Think high tech.

Seriously: think high tech.

Now what did you think of?

You probably didn't consider that sweaty, grimy automated wonder: the
factory floor. And when you think of the Year 2000 crisis, you probably don't imagine its direct effect on the United Auto Workers or Coca-Cola bottlers.

But for the last year or so, Topro (TPRO:Nasdaq) has been thinking plenty about Y2K's factory floor implications. And, of late, so have the traders. They've driven once-lowly TPRO stock up 215% in the last six weeks. This week alone, driven by rabid postings on the Motley Fool and Silicon Investor (by notorious posters such as TokyoMex), the stock is up 18.2%. Best yet, some traders and analysts think the stock, which closed Friday at 6 11/16, is still quite cheap.

Topro has been in the business of "control system integration." That means, basically, that the company goes into the factories, takes an inventory and then designs and installs systems to coordinate disparate pieces of hardware and software. When Topro started to test for Year 2000 problems (the widespread problem of computers and software that will crash after Dec. 31, 1999) they found tremendous cracks in the systems and no one else around to fix them.

"This is very different from most Year 2000 problems," says Topro President John Jenkins. "If you go to a financial institution or an insurance company, you've got one or two types of computer mainframes and millions of lines of code -- the problem has a narrow scope and it's very deep. But on the factory floor, you can have dozens of computers and systems and software, but there's not much code. So there you have a problem that's very broad and shallow. It's truly different and needs a different approach."

So Topro has been offering that approach. From their established base on the factory floors of Coca-Cola, Amoco (AN:NYSE), Boeing (BA:NYSE) and Georgia-Pacific (GP:NYSE), Topro is now selling Y2K assessments and fixes. "The assessment is going to be a huge deal for this stock," says Skip Davidson, a money manager with First New York Securities. "They go into a company and say, 'For $10,000, we'll find all your factory floor Year 2000 problems.' Now what company isn't going to spend that to stay in business? They have approximately 5,000 customers: Right there is $50 million."

Of course, once Topro gets a foot in the door to do an assessment finding problems can lead to a lot more business. "They did an assessment for Sun Oil that involved three plants," says Davidson. "When they found a problem in the third plant they checked, Sun asked them to just go ahead and replace the entire $300,000 batch control system. So three $10,000 assessments grew into $330,000 in revenue right fast."

Year 2000 isn't all their business, of course. Last year Karl Drobnic, who writes the investment newsletter Venture Returns, picked TPRO as a turnaround story because they'd put behind an ugly past as a control systems integrator for municipal projects and wastewater treatment plants. "I liked these guys before they were in the Year 2000 space," says Drobnic. "Systems integration is a mom-and-pop business and these guys are stepping in here and, through acquisitions and a national sales approach, taking a big piece of this business. And the new management under Jenkins is doing a
terrific job."

Davidson is also enamored with Jenkins. "The guy is aces," says the money manager. "I like the management: There's no bullshit with them. They know they stumbled on to this and they'll say it. But they're also doing everything they can to capitalize on this to make some long-term gains from this problem."

In the quarter ended March 31, Topro reported revenue of $11.2 million, up from $5.9 million one year earlier. Net income rose to $500,000, or 5 cents per share, from a loss of $1.1 million, or 26 cents a share, a year ago.

But past earnings aren't much guidance when looking at a company that has just discovered a pot of gold. "We're still doing modeling of the impact of Year 2000," says Jenkins. "In the next two to three weeks we'll be able to talk to analysts and give them some guidance on the Year 2000's impact on earnings going forward."

Davidson, for one, isn't waiting for earnings (the June 30 quarter will be reported in the next four weeks) -- he's buying now. "I started buying it at $4, I paid $6.50 for it today and I'm still buying it. I was the bid all day long on the stock, and I've already got about half a million shares."

Those calculations figure that Topro -- in the next year -- will earn $80 million in its basic business and Year 2000. At 16 times revenue -- comparable to other Y2K companies like Data Dimensions (DDIM:Nasdaq) at 15 times revenue and Zitel (ZITL:Nasdaq) at 19 times revenue -- that would give them a $400 million market cap. Topro will probably continue its Wayne Huizenga-ish approach of acquiring new companies with stock options, so in a year, Davidson figures Topro will have a 21.5 million-share float. And that would give it an $18 stock.

"Maybe I'm nuts," says Davidson. "But I'm still buying. Who doesn't need a home run?"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sometime you can't tell the players without a scorecard. On the web, we keep score forever.

Zebra

(who was not surprised by the KO announcement, because he learned to listen to people like Karl and Skipard)