SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Chas who wrote (29546)3/5/1998 9:40:00 PM
From: Richard Russell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 53903
 
A service of Semiconductor Business News, CMP Media Inc.
Story posted at 4:30 p.m. EST/1:30 a.m. PST, 3/5/98

TI still looks for DRAM solution

By J. Robert Lineback

DALLAS--Texas Instruments Inc. has not yet given up on the DRAM business
but it is finding it harder to tolerate the current round of losses and
the unpredictable nature of the memory business, said TI president and
CEO Thomas J. (Tom) Engibous during an annual briefing here today for
financial analysts and the media.

On Wednesday, TI and its original DRAM joint-venture partner, the Acer
Group in Taiwan, announced an agreement to end their collaboration in
DRAM manufacturing. Under the agreement, Acer intends to acquire TI's
33% stake in their Taiwan venture and will use the operation to pursue
silicon foundry services (see March 4 story).

The announcement has increased speculation that TI is planning to
eventually exist the DRAM business after failing to bring stability to
its much celebrated joint-venture model. In the early 1990s, TI pursued
the joint-venture strategy to insulate itself from the volatile nature
of the commodity DRAMs while it focused more resources to grow higher
value products, such as digital signal processing (DSP).

Fielding questions from analysts, Engibous admitted that TI's top
management continues to struggle with the solution. When asked what it
would take for TI to finally decide that it could no longer tolerate
DRAM losses, Engibous refused to comment, saying it was TI's policy to
not talk about exiting or acquiring businesses.

However, it's clear that TI is not yet willing to say it is giving up.
"Over the [entire DRAM business] cycle, we see a very good return on
investment capital because our joint-venture strategy," Engibous said.
"We are still working diligently to figure out how we get the volatility
to be consistent with the goals of the whole company."

Engibous added, "While we have made some progress, we don't have the
answer as we stand here today."

What Engibous and other TI officials want is to find a way weather bad
times in DRAMs and still come close to the company's two key business
goals: an average of 20% revenue growth and 20% return on invested
capital. Engibous said the DRAM joint ventures have the potential to
meet TI's return on invested capital goal because the majority of the
capital investments are made by partners. The problem has been the
volatility of DRAM pricing, he added.

"Make no mistake about it, we look at our memory business as we look at
all of our businesses," Engibous promised. "It must add value consistent
with our company objectives."

TI has explored a wide range of options--"more than there are options,"
quipped Engibous after his presentation. While he would not discuss
details of these options, Engibous hinted of the kind of new
arrangements being explored with TI's remaining joint-venture
partnerships Singapore and Japan. "One option has been to consider
payment based upon bits vs. DRAM devices," he said, referring to TI's
discounted price for memories purchased from the joint-venture fab. "The
bit growth continues at more than 70%."



To: Chas who wrote (29546)3/5/1998 9:40:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug  Respond to of 53903
 
chas, they aren't dumping. there is no problem. for anybody other than those companies that can't compete and want uncle sugar to bail them out. that is their mentality. mu has a few of deming's deadly diseases. and mu is dead ;-)



To: Chas who wrote (29546)3/5/1998 10:35:00 PM
From: Stephen M. DeMoss  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 53903
 
Then will someone explain the upgrades? eom Steve D.