Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Osicom(FIBR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: craig crawford who wrote (5688)	3/5/1998 11:07:00 PM
From: Grantcw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10479

Craig, I may have heard this wrong and I beg you to correct me, but I'm pretty sure that the conference call stated that Osicom had shipped some Gigamux's to Brooks Fiber for deployment. There was a whole big confusion when this question was asked, but I thought someone on management said that Brooks was going to be pay for them in a timely manner. Something like that? Was I hearing things? Anyone? I don't want to spread any rumors, seriously confused. Grant

To: craig crawford who wrote (5688)	3/6/1998 2:22:00 AM
From: CH	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10479

Craig, I do not know why you start to realize that FIBR is not something you like at such an early stage,(at least for me), but after I listened to the CC, the way they threw out the answer about Brook's order, the way they delay announcement of Brook's approval, the way they mentioned the Asia part....all in all, with my understanding of how business is done in this field, I believe you are right. I would not short this stock as I have so such guts, but certainly I will sell my position. Those who cannot agree with Craig, ask yourself a question : if Par is so confident that no competitor can get in and compete with him in short haul market and the market is so big and he has so much confidence that Gigamux will become the top 3 seller in the next year, why can't he name some figure, like minimum we can sell 30 units, or 100 units. Why did he tune the whole expression as a political speech, I can almost catch nothing on that except that we are so great, we have great products, and we will win the whole world, because we are in the hottest field... is that a kind of propaganda he learned from Chairman Mao? CH