Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : (LVLT) - Level 3 Communications -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dog who wrote (204)	3/6/1998 10:23:00 AM
From: zj	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3873

Thanks for your analysis Dog. I don't think there will be any IPO, it will just get listed on the board, not unnoticed of coarse. I agree still a good buy,even up to possible spit or listing. This one should treat anyone real well for years to come.

To: Dog who wrote (204)	3/6/1998 10:31:00 AM
From: Jim Furley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3873

>>>>This isn't an IPO but a spinoff>>>> - Motley Fool article. The big question is: "will there or won't there" be an IPO? Jim

To: Dog who wrote (204)	3/6/1998 12:19:00 PM
From: Paul G	Respond to of 3873

Hi, Are you aware there are over 145 milion shares of Kiewit D Paul

To: Dog who wrote (204)	3/6/1998 5:29:00 PM
From: Robert Dwyer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3873

I was working some numbers this afternoon at the office and came up with a much different number...must be doing something wrong....here goes: 145 million shares outstanding (figure given to me today by company) $3 billion cash $841 million RCN (48.5%) $est. $225 CTCO (48.5%) $est. $85 Cabl (48.5%) coal biz- ? computer outsource biz --? I used $650 million for those two businesses combined and that totals to 4.8billion divided by 145 million = $33/share. 650 million was the company revenue figure for 1996 (97 not yet available) and I used 1x revenue. No debt as of this writing. I know book is often calculated at cost so is that what you are doing versus my present value calculation or am I off on some figure? Thanks for your help. Bob