Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ed Fishbaine who wrote (5248)	3/6/1998 2:33:00 PM
From: Dennis DeNoble	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Correction and Clarification TO ALL: CORRECTION: In my post to Ed Fishbane, #5327 on 5/5/98, I mistakenly quoted the ore pile as 250,000 tons as opposed to 500,000 tons as previously reported. Simply an error! CLARIFICATION: In the letter to Mr. Fishbane I said " Taking this statement and your assumption that this translates to $1,200 per ton of head ore, that is still 4 ounces of gold equivalent per ton. Are you saying that you would be unhappy if had 250,000 tons of only 3 gold equivalent ounces per ton sitting on the surface waiting to be refined? I don't really think so." THAT IS WHAT I SAID! Please note that I only said that I did not believe that Mr. Fishbane would be unhappy with 3 gold equivalent ounces per ton sitting on the surface waiting to be refined. NOWHERE DID I SAY THAT I THOUGHT THE ORE WAS WORTH LESS THAN $1,200 PER TON and if fact I stated that "FRANKLY NONE OF US KNOW WHAT WE WILL GET OUT OF THESE FIRST 1031 LBS. OF DORE BARS AND I REFUSE TO GUESS." I consider myself to be fairly articulate and direct. If you read what I say, you will know what I mean. Please extend me the courtesy of not reading other things into what I say. Dennis DeNoble