SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Flair who wrote (5383)3/6/1998 3:00:00 PM
From: X-Ray Man  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 74651
 
This is right, Flair. My take is that MSFT may be
unfairly using current "near monopoly" position
to leverage NT and CE, but that Gates is correct
that if they fritter away a two year dev cycle, they
can lose that monopoly. For example, although AAPL
is twice down, it is not out. If their new server OS
were adopted by some Intel platform OEMs, and they
successfully marketed a vertically integrated desktop
to server solution, MSFT may not lose dominance, but
could lose enough marketshare to no longer qualify as
a monopoly. The irony in this process, is that the
DOJ proceedings will be so drawn out, that by the time
they are completed, a scenario such as this could have
already have played out making the DOJ action moot.

However, there is a warning to MSFT investors in all
of this. Either MSFT is a monopoly, and it WILL be
regulated. Or MSFT is not a monopoly, and can be
attacked by competitors. In either case, these are not
the situations the most optimistic MSFT longs dream about.
Many posting here seem to feel MSFT can maintain its
market dominance and aggressive marketing practices, without
modification, and not be affected by DOJ. Not going to
happen. Either DOJ will get some, though partial, satis-
faction, or MSFT will yield in the marketplace because of
a competitor. Either situation is less than ideal for
some of the more enthusiastic promoters of the stock.

JMO.