Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hippieslayer who wrote (16624)	3/6/1998 5:41:00 PM
From: Henry Niman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 32384

Watch what happens on Monday!

To: Hippieslayer who wrote (16624)	3/9/1998 2:00:00 PM
From: Hippieslayer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32384

Henry YOu are right but up to a point.Your responses never referred to LGND's trading range. Since the meat of my post was about the lack of response from lignand regarding their LLY drug or money decision, your response of "Wait till monday" was taken to meant about news regarding the deal. Maybe you need to clarify your remarks a bit so there isn't any confusion.And if you did mean to remark about the trading range, why didn't you just say so in the first place instead of leading everyone on? Even though I could care less if news came out today or not, it sort of makes thinking people believe that you are trying to wiggle out of this one. I'll let it slide cuz lgnd's now up .5!!!!

To: Hippieslayer who wrote (16624)	3/10/1998 9:19:00 AM
From: Henry Niman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32384

FUGAZI, I am responding to the post that had your rhetorical question: "Did ligand take the money and run or did they select a drug? Some seemed to be confident that we'd learn of their decision this week. I guess not." Ask and answered questions are usually rhetorical. My response "Watch what happens on Monday!" was to this post (but not to your rhetorical question) and I did clarify again and again that I was NOT responding to the above rhetorical question.