SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JMD who wrote (9082)3/6/1998 9:29:00 PM
From: Sawtooth  Respond to of 152472
 
Surfer Mike and Grand Board(Bored?)Master of the Mighty Q throng:

<<got hammered on the January '98 Ripple (magnificent bouquet, though a touch shy in after taste) and had a terrific night in the c-pile which nobody should knock if they haven't tried it. When we came up for air (okay the methane was a little off-putting), the Q had a + sign in the closing column, the DJ was up 100 or more,.....Since I projected an Armageddon that didn't happen, would someone else whose Crystal Ball is in better working order fill me in? Surfer Mike>>

Waaaiiit a second, Mike. INTC warns at end of day, we hit the compost shelter (thanks for the sandwiches and Ripple, by the way!), Dow closes up over a 100, techs roar like a G* launch, Q closes up, and, to top it all off, CPQ warns at the end of the day ..... Back to the compost pile Monday morning!!! Our plan worked like a charm! (remember, our plan...? Yes, of course, you remember, the plan!) We saved the @#!#!$ day for everyone! We should be compensated!!! (Or committed; please pass the Ripple.)

See you Monday morning sharp at the compost pile, Mike; we have work to do! Sure brought new meaning to putting "grey poop-on" the sandwiches! (Whoah, enough Ripple, thanks!)

Regards. ; )



To: JMD who wrote (9082)3/7/1998 1:16:00 AM
From: qdog  Respond to of 152472
 
No, I'm considering a legal action against Hardy. His news article has prove to be incorrect and yet no retraction, not that I have a love affair with MOT. I find it suspect and with a certain paid for publishing flavor to it.