To: W.F.Rakecky who wrote (13456 ) 3/7/1998 2:00:00 AM From: Scrapps Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 22053
W.F., The USR division of COMS is as much a software company as it is a hardware company, this was pointed out to me a year and half ago by none other than David and PRB. The USR code is well a head of the other 56K modem chip makers. The ability for USR to tune their customers modems is provided by the on board DSP using code (upgradable) from FlashRam. I took particular interest in the following from BoardWatch: WHYS AND WHEREFORES Why the disparity between these two modem technologies? We're not sure. But we have a couple of theories of course. US Robotics got out the gate pretty early and with a chipset designed to be flashRAM upgradeable. To some degree, they pioneered the concept of a digital signal processor (DSP) code driven from upgradeable flashRAM. This will actually pay off rather richly here shortly. Any Courier modem manufactured in the last FOUR YEARS will be upgradeable to the new V.90 standard with no hardware at all. And all Sportsters manufactured after about October 1996 will be as well. Further, they recognized fairly early on that there was no such thing as a "telephone network" in the United States, much less worldwide. There are lots of networks. And they vary tremendously. To address this, they used an old trick rather well. They set up a BBS. They equipped 1,400 beta testers with the modem at a consequently wide disparity of locations. These test sites ran a software test suite that dialed the BBS and ran through a series of tests. At the end of the test, the modem uploaded a simple ASCII text file containing the performance results for each test and the software version used. These results were sucked into an SQL database and summed, accumulated, plotted, averaged, and spewed forth with some alacrity. The result was that US Robotics engineers could distribute a new version of code one day, and come in the next morning to see the results in large-scale printouts that indicated who got better, who got worse, and who the new version had broken entirely. An interactive national test bench for x2 code. They had a meter to map digital line impairments. They issued hundreds of new versions that never saw the light of day outside of this test group to try to map the best operation across the widest variety of digital networks available. They even did this internationally to countries like Korea with truly crippled telephone networks. And they worked directly with a lot of ISPs along the way as well. ROK didn't do that, and I doubt LU did either...because they don't build the end product...only a portion of the guts. ROK based modems (Zoom is one brand) have a couple other problems to over come now. There were 250,000 non-flashable chips the are reported to have made it to the street in end products. And there exists a memory shortage on board some modems with ROK chips, which, make them unable to hold both the V.90 and the PCM versions of the code. This cause a problem in timing the update to V.90 with your ISP...not to mention other ISPs & modems. A software switch at the ISP to identify and switch to the code version of the modem calling in is one partial answer...but not a cure all. As I understand it 3Com's USR modems don't have a problem and we can upgrade as soon as the V.90 code available for our model of modem. The V.90 code is available for some USR modems now on the 3Com website. Again from BoardWatch:As to the modems, 3COM/US Robotics x2 modem is very clearly the winner of the 56K battle at this point, and we would look for a continued dominance in actual performance on release of the new V.90 modems. Indeed, rumor has it 3COM was about to release some strongly improved code and decided to hold it for the V.90 release. So we think 56 Kbps modems will be getting better. And we now have a standard - V.90. But the battle is not precisely over. There will likely be ongoing performance differences in this round that the speed you encounter online very much a function of the modem you select. We have enjoyed a period for the past few years where almost any modem at any price would more or less work and deliver the "standard" V.34 speeds. This will simply not be the case with V.90 modems. They may interoperate, at some speed between 2,400 bps and 52 Kbps, but you will most likely get the best performance using a modem and technology that matches the one supported by your ISP. And at least initially, significantly better performance will be available from the 3COM/US Robotics V.90 products. Is it proprietary? It would appear the DSP/memory model has ousted the monolithic chipset model, even at Rockwell Semiconductor Systems. So hopefully you will find it difficult to locate a non-upgradeable modem. Something to pay close attention to is the last paragraph from BoardWatch...or Jack Rickard:It would be much more comfortable for us editorially if all these modems were created more or less equal. From the test data we have available, unfortunately they are not. We do sincerely apologize for bringing this information to light in such tardy fashion given the implications for so many end users and Internet service providers. Sorry for not keeping it short. Scrapps