Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Analogy Software (ANLG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: the eagle who wrote (68)	3/7/1998 12:33:00 PM
From: James Unterburger	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 88

We have the most parts in our library over any of our competitors. We have the best (technically) library creation group around. (I should know, I used to work for Mentor's library group; not to diss them (us at the time), but Analogy's lab is better equipped.) Temperature effects modeling etc. The perception, however, may (may) be that since we are not a SPICE-like simulator, that accuracy on the simulator side is not as great as a SPICE-like simulator. This is especially true for IC simulation. But we (I mean "Saber") is a more high-level systems-level simulator that can handle multiple technologies, not just electrical/electronic, all with the same design. That plus our integrations into other simulators (Verilog etc.) through co-simulation gives us a distinct advantage over what SPICE-based simulators can offer. Mentor Graphics for one just announced they are dumping the backplane (SimMatrix) technology from Precedence and will not even offer co-simulation (or so it seems)! So how did I get sidetracked from libraries to talking about simulation and co-simulation?