SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Donahoe who wrote (17962)3/6/1998 11:45:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24154
 
Hey JD, you want to take the pop quiz too? Demagoguery indeed.

Microsoft currently hold 90 percent of the operating system market share with its popular Windows system, but Gates refused to characterize that as monopoly, insisting instead that Microsoft products have a very short shelf-life and are constantly threatened by competitors.

He said a bright innovator could replace Windows "in a day."

McNealy and Jim Barksdale of Netscape Communications, however, said they doubt the Windows operating system could be replaced in their lifetimes because it is so widely used around the world.

"That would be about as easy as switching the national language from English to Dutch," McNealy said.


Now, who's the better demagog here? Who's in closer proximity to the truth in this little exchange? Bill, the most brilliant businessman of the age (and there's no sarcasm there, either, for a change) took how many years to get Windows where it is, but some "bright innovator" could replace it in a day.

You want antitrust law repealed, the process is relatively straightforward. You just got to muster a little political muscle. Now that Bill understands his former political naivete, it shouldn't be any problem at all, should it?

Cheers, Dan.



To: John Donahoe who wrote (17962)3/7/1998 12:40:00 AM
From: Bearded One  Respond to of 24154
 
IBM has 8 times Microsoft's revenues and much greater earnings, yet the DOJ doesn't go after them. GE has greater revenues and earnings, yet the DOJ doesn't go after them. Same with a dozen other companies. So the argument that the DOJ is going after Microsoft just because of their size doesn't comport with the facts.