Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JMD who wrote (9086)	3/7/1998 1:33:00 AM
From: DWB	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Don't know if any of you caught it, but the guest Market Monitor on Nightly Business Report (Bruce Sherman) mentioned QCOM as a stock that looks attractive below $50. Here's a link to the transcript, the comment is about 2/3 down the page. quote.com DWB

To: JMD who wrote (9086)	3/9/1998 7:56:00 PM
From: John Cuthbertson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Mike, A comment about the "CDMA Vs. GSM" article that you posted from the LSI thread on Saturday. The article repeatedly mentions the idea that some carriers (especially smaller ones and those in less developed countries) will choose to go with GSM because of its "time-to-market" advantage. It seems to me that the results of the roll-out of digital cellular and PCS services in the U.S. clearly demonstrates that there is no such advantage for GSM. The GSM vendors certainly touted that as an advantage, but it utterly failed to materialize. In fact, I think that the results would point to CDMA systems as having had better time-to-market performance. The author seems not to have examined whether this claimed GSM advantage actually exists; this makes me question how well she has done her homework. One interesting point: if the numbers in the article are right, CDMA systems are already ahead of GSM systems in the U.S., with 1.5 M vs. 1.2 M subscribers. ==John