Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Fulvio Castelli who wrote (6399)	3/7/1998 11:04:00 AM
From: Robert van Mil	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10836

Fulvio, Interesting to note that KRY now has a pro-KRY forum on stockwatch. Isn't that defeating the purpose of discussion a bit. Kind of like, please give us your opinion, as long as you agree. Wrong attitude IMO. I tripled my money on this one going long, but got out a few weeks ago when the risk / reward ratio stopped making sense, and half a year or so ago, when it doubled for me. All in all, I had money in it for well over a year. I still don't care if my assessment of the situation was right or wrong, or whether somebody calls Fung a drunk or claims Oppenheimer's mother wears army boots. As an investment opportunity it was perfect, and it may well get to the point that I jump in again. Don't fall in love with your investments. It doesn't pay. The pro-KRY crowd is starting to sound more and more like a fan-club. But it is the players that make the money, not the cheerleaders. All the best, and good luck Robert

To: Fulvio Castelli who wrote (6399)	3/7/1998 3:42:00 PM
From: Mama Bear	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 10836

Umm, Fullofit, before you make too much of that 1989 "judgement", why not give a call to the court and find out if it's real? I believe it was a mock up done by some disgruntled long. They didn't even spell his name right. I also like the way that folks zone in on that BW article, where he gave a couple of off the cuff sell recs. It's not the same as publishing a formal "strong sell" rec. You can argue all you want, but it isn't going to change reality. Barb