Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: alan miller who wrote (6443)	3/7/1998 7:38:00 PM
From: Mama Bear	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10836

>>>However, this is beginning to emerge as a clearly staged effort to cover a position taken at US5.00 at an unacceptable risk level. <<< This is only a dream of the longs. This is a standard argument that is presented on just about every Asensio related thread, and is exactly on schedule. Check the ERGB and ZONA threads if you don't believe me. The folks at ERGB even went so far as to claim that Asensio had covered. The stock's price was between 10 and 14 at the time. ERGB closed yesterday at 4 11/16. I'd be willing to bet money that Asensio's cost basis is well over 5, were there anyway to prove it. You guys can get all wrapped up in these crazy theories, and stroke each other until you believe them. It really won't matter in the end. Many here speak of doing due diligence, what is so hard about going to previous Asensio related threads and seeing how the longs reacted there? You can skip the WDRY thread, there are nothing but short sellers there. But I think you'll be shocked at how similar the arguments against Asensio are, compared to this thread. I know I'm shocked how the same stuff happens over and over. I guess it's just hard to admit that you're wrong about a company, and these are the defense mechanisms. Like I said, Asensio is due for a bad call. It's about the only real thing that the longs can hang their hat on, as far as I can see. Barb

To: alan miller who wrote (6443)	3/7/1998 8:17:00 PM
From: Bill Jackson	Respond to of 10836

Alan, Until I read your post I partly believed Bawbawas assessment of Assenio as a god-like being with an unblemished record of correct calls, both shorts and longs. I now see he has more bad calls than good calls, and has no feet left to shoot at, having shot all four,the usual number for an Ass, more than once according to your post . As the Berra said "It ain't over 'til it's over" But you have shown all that he has feet of clay. Bill

To: alan miller who wrote (6443)	3/7/1998 8:55:00 PM
From: alan miller	Respond to of 10836

With regard to response to Barbara J. Payne and to all the KRY newsrelease referred to (in #6433) was dated June 15, 1997 NOT June 5 as previoulsy stated (typo). The relevant info begins on line 8. Sorry about that. good luck to all, regards, am

To: alan miller who wrote (6443)	4/1/1998 4:01:00 AM
From: Graystone	Respond to of 10836

Excellent Advice Allan or Clearly Barbie objects to the "clearly staged effort" part, I wonder why ? Barbie is in on all of the great As*** kills, didn't you know that, and Barbie never defends Mr. As*, did you know that. The more I read here the more upset I get. She is such an obvious Asensio mouthpiece** it is incredible that anyone would read her at all. It is the campaign you have to worry about, she isn't here alone you know, I have already been warned off, privately of course. heheheh