Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications (ASND) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeff Jordan who wrote (38386)	3/8/1998 1:14:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 61433

BUSINESS WEEK ONLINE March 6, 1998 THE INTEL EFFECT: LESS THAN FEARED -- FOR NOW Given Intel's status as a bellwether for stocks, the chip giant's bad news on Mar. 4 didn't wreak as much havoc in the markets on Mar. 5 as many investors expected. Although Intel Corp. (INTC) suffered a punishing decline of 10 13/16 points, to close at 75 5/8 -- a 12.5% drop -- major market indexes closed down a much more modest 1% to 3%. Much of the damage came soon after the opening bell. The Dow Jones industrial average had slid about 80 points by 10 a.m. and closed down 94.91 points, or 1.1%. The tech-heavy NASDAQ Composite immediately lost about 50 points, but was down 47.78 points, or 2.7%, by the close of trading. "All in all, the market could have acted much worse," says Peter Coolidge, managing director of equity trading at Brean Murray & Co. "Intel was a shocker. There was a quick correction in values as investors who had to get out got out. Then the buyers stepped in -- but not at any price." "Things aren't as bad as you might think," Tim Grazioso, head of NASDAQ trading at Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., said at mid-afternoon. "There is a fair amount of cash around. The one having a hard time is Intel." The semiconductor giant warned after the close on Mar. 4 that first-quarter earnings would come in lower than analysts had been projecting because of weaker demand for its products. This created fear that PC demand is slowing and anxiety that other companies' first-quarter earnings would also be lower than expected. "Obviously, PC stocks all got hammered pretty significantly in light of the news," says Todd Baker, who covers hardware and peripherals for Hambrecht & Quist. Dell (DELL) fell 7 3/16 points to 130 3/4, a 5% drop; Compaq Computer (CPQ) fell 7/8 to 27 1/8, a 3.1% decline; and Gateway 2000 (GTW) declined 1 3/8 to 37 5/8, a 3.5% loss. Baker thinks demand for PCs is holding up but that computer makers will have to contend with too much supply and aggressive pricing. "We've been pretty cautious on the whole group," says Baker. Dell is the only one he currently recommends. Still, some traders were surprised that the damage wasn't worse. Like computer makers, Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) didn't suffer losses nearly as steep in percentage terms as Intel's. Shares of the software king and tech bellwether fell 2 1/4 points to 80 1/16, a 2.7% decline. "If both those companies are dominant suppliers to the PC industry and if PC sales slow down, they should each slow down," notes Kevin Landis, co-manager of the Technology Value Fund. Indeed, even though traders were pleased the market held up reasonably well on Mar. 5, they're cautious about the future. "It will be interesting to look back and see whether this signaled a market top or was just another hiccup in our steady march upwards and onwards," says Coolidge. He says it will take a couple of days for analysts to adjust to Intel's news. A monthly unemployment number due out on Friday will also have an impact on overall market sentiment. "There is a sense the economy might be heating up," says Coolidge. "The unemployment numbers will be scrutinized even more closely in light of Intel." Grazioso notes that a lot of short positions in big stocks such as Dell and Microsoft may have helped support prices. (Short-sellers sell borrowed shares, hoping the stock price will decline, and they can pay back the loan with cheaper shares, pocketing the difference.) Short-covering brings buyers into the market even if the overall tone on a stock is negative. Still, this could be a time to be cautious when looking for values. Landis remains wary of technology stocks that are affiliated with PCs. And he notes that even chipmakers that have nothing to do with the PC market also sold off on Mar. 5. The latter could bounce back, though. "If you like chip stocks that have nothing to do with PCs, this was a terrific day to go shopping," he says. He recommends Vitesse Semiconductor (VTSS), which makes high-speed chips used in telecommunications products. "It doesn't go anywhere near the PC market," he says. "It has everything to do with the telecom market and mostly U.S. telecom." It closed down 2 1/8 Thursday at 45 after trading as high as 56 last September -- before getting caught in the general tech sell-off. The "general business outlook hasn't changed" for such companies, says Landis. He also recommends high-speed networkers PMC-Sierra (PMCS) and Level One Communications (LEVL), which both declined two points, or about 5%, on Mar. 5.