Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Fulvio Castelli who wrote (6528)	3/8/1998 10:45:00 PM
From: Dan P	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10836

Fulvio and others: There is an interesting post in Stockhouse, with a link to Asensio's calls: (perhaps it has already been posted here, as I haven't been able to read all of the notes). He has already had this settlement for fraud, in 1989, which I have attached to this note. Here is the link: see geocities.com Regards Dan Norman Murphy, Plaintiff vs. Steinberg & Lymas, etc., Defendants FINAL JUDGEMENT FINDINGS OF FACT __________________________________________________ This case was tried to a jury on March 27 1989, and testimony was presented by both the Plaintiff, Norman Murphy, and Robert Kilbride. This court, having heard and considered the testimony, including but not limited to Robert Kilbride's statement that the Defendant admitted the willful and intentional acts of the Defendants resulted in the Plaintiff's loss, this Court specifically finds that the claimant has demonstrated to the Court by clear and convincing evidence that the award is not excessive in light of the facts and circumstances which were presented to the trier of fact. THEREFORE, pursuant to the verdict rendered in this action on March 27, 1989, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff, NORMAN E. MURPHY, recover from Defendant, MANUEL P. ASENCIO, the sum of Forty Eight Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($48,250.00) in compensatory damages and the sum of Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000.00) in punative damages for FRAUD and DECEIT, the total judgement being fo the sum of Two Hundred Forty Eight Thousand Two Hundred Fifty ($248,250.00), that shall bear interest at the rate of twelve percent (12%) a year, for which let execution issue. DONE AND ORDERED at Stuart, Martin County, Florida, this 3rd day of April, 1989. John Fennelly, CIRCUIT JUDGE

To: Fulvio Castelli who wrote (6528)	3/8/1998 10:57:00 PM
From: Dan P	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10836

Fulvio: Thank you for listing the three court decisions which have all been in I. Mael's favor. In case some of you dont't understand this there is no longer any title dispute. The property LC 4 and 6 are officially registered in I. Mael/KRY. Placer is totally out of this. Period. End of story. In this chaotic week (for those long KRY) it is important to consider facts only. This includes the rulings that you have outlined, Fulvio, and several others. This company has superior management, and has added the likes of Robert Fung, now chairman, and Mr. Paris, former ambassador to Spain. Marc Oppenheimer, president of the company, is in a class by himself. I have never met a sharper, more dedicated, harder working president of a company. I would without hesitation believe what he tells me, before I would pay any attention to a shark like Asensio and colleagues, whose motives are patently ovious. The company has also developed close ties to the Venezuelan Government, and is in the process of developing a consortium, which will eclipse the Las Cristinas iself. Would people like Fung or Paris join Crystallex if they were not certain of the outcome? Crystallex has acquired hard rock rights to the Albino. Does this suggest anything but support from the ministry of mines? Where is Placer in all this? Regretably, nowhere! To those of you long Crystallex, and concerned, I shared your anxiety this past week. As in all such endeavors, the truth will come out, and we will be vindicated, with a company that will attain a market cap much greater than at its recent high. I remain long and very confident in the company. The likes of Asensio and others will come and go, but in the end we will emerge winners. Regards Dan

To: Fulvio Castelli who wrote (6528)	3/8/1998 11:37:00 PM
From: shorty	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10836

Nicely said Fulvio. Last two times I spelled your name wrong were an honest mistake. Now with KRY investing in Mael the property has again changed hands, to the tune of 13.7 million unaccounted for dollars. Does this transfer have to be approved by MEM ? And if so back to 1986, this is when KRY invested in MAEL ? See I'm learning. The first transfer then is valid simply because Supreme court has forced MEM to Gazzete ? Because if the transfer to KRY has not been Gazzeted then PDG'S claim does have validity. Or am I missing something here ?(other than a few million brain cells). I also have a tendancy to beleive the posted rulings simply for lack of posted rulings to the contrary. I think that I may finish covering tommorow simply because I don't know. But am willing to wager that Ven Gov finds a hole somewhere and forces a resolution on this. Creating a partnership that will get things rolling. Allowing all parties to save face (Ven Gov included). PDG does have 60 mil invested and has been there for a while. I can't quite figure out why Chrystallex was willing to settle if things are as cut and dry as they appear ? And so to all a good Night. Scott